References
Blair, D. C. and M. E. Maron. “An Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness for a Full-Text Document Retrieval System.”Communications of the ACM, 28, 3 (1985), 289–299.
Cowden-Clarke, Mary.The Complete Concordance to Shakespeare: Being a Verbal Index to All the Passages in the Dramatic Works of the Poet. Boston: Little and Brown, 1845.
Fischer, Marguerite. “The KWIC Index Concept: A Retrospective View.”American Documentation, 17 (1966), 57–70.
Fligelstone, Steve. “Developing a Scheme for Annotating Text to Show Anaphoric Relations.”New Directions in English Language Corpora: Methodology, Results, Software Developments. Ed. Gerhard Leitner. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992.
Fligelstone, Steve. “Some Reflections on the Question of Teaching, from a Corpus Linguistics Perspective.”ICAME Journal, 17 (1993), 97–109.
Higgins, John. “Which Concordancer? A Comparative Review of MS-DOS Software.”System, 19 (1991), 91–100.
Hofland, Knut. “Concordance Programs for Personal Computers.”English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide. Eds. Stig Johansson and Anna-Brita Stenström. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991.
Luhn, H. P. “Keyword-In-Context Index for Technical Literature (KWIC Index).”American Documentation, 11, 4 (1960), 288–295.
Tribble, Chris and Glyn Jones.Concordances in the Classroom: A Resource Book for Teachers. London: Longman, 1990.
Additional information
Joseph A. Feustle, Jr. is a Professor of Latin American Literature at the University of Toledo. In addition to articles on computers, he has published on the Latin American essay, novel, poetry and theater.
Paul T. Keyser is Prescott W. Townsend Asst. Professor (a research professorship), in the Dept. of Classics at Cornell. He holds doctorates in Physics and Classics, and works on control experiments in stylometry, as well as on Latin prose and Ancient Greek Science (and some modern physics). See: “Stylometric Method and the Chronology of Plato's Works,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review,3 (1992), 58–74; “The Length and Scansion of Propertius II as Evidence for Book Division,” Philologus,136 (1992), 81–88.
Catherine N. Ball is an assistant professor of linguistics at Georgetown University and a former professional software developer. She is the author of articles on computational linguistics, corpus linguistics, and the history of the English language.
Kathryn B. Taylor is a graduate student in linguistics at Georgetown University and a professional computational linguist. Ball and Taylor are currently collaborating on an electronic version of The Ormulum.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feustle, J.A., Keyser, P.T., Ball, C.N. et al. Courseware reviews. Comput Hum 28, 199–209 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830740
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830740