Skip to main content
Log in

Cutting planes, connectivity, and threshold logic

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Originating from work in operations research the cutting plane refutation systemCP is an extension of resolution, where unsatisfiable propositional logic formulas in conjunctive normal form are recognized by showing the non-existence of boolean solutions to associated families of linear inequalities. Polynomial sizeCP proofs are given for the undirecteds-t connectivity principle. The subsystemsCP q ofCP, forq≥2, are shown to be polynomially equivalent toCP, thus answering problem 19 from the list of open problems of [8]. We present a normal form theorem forCP 2-proofs and thereby for arbitraryCP-proofs. As a corollary, we show that the coefficients and constant terms in arbitrary cutting plane proofs may be exponentially bounded by the number of steps in the proof, at the cost of an at most polynomial increase in the number of steps in the proof. The extensionCPLE +, introduced in [9] and there shown top-simulate Frege systems, is proved to be polynomially equivalent to Frege systems. Lastly, since linear inequalities are related to threshold gates, we introduce a new threshold logic and prove a completeness theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajtai, M.: Parity and the pigeonhole principle. In: Buss, S.R., Scott, P.J. (eds.) Feasible Mathematics, pp. 1–24. Basel: Birkhäuser 1990

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ajtai, M., Fagin, R.: Reachability is harder for directed than for undirected finite graphs. J. Symb. Logic55: 113–150 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beame, P., Impagliazzo, R., Krajíček, J., Pitassi, T., Pudlák, P., Woods, A.: Exponential lower bounds for the pigeonhole principle. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 200–220. New York: Association for Computing Machinery 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beame, P., Cook, S., Papadimitriou, C., Pitassi, T.: The relative complexity of NP search problems. Proceeding of the 27th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 303–314. New York: Association for Computing Machinery 1995

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buss, S.: The propositional pigeonhole principle has polynomial size Frege proofs. J. Symb. Logic52: 916–927 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buss, S., Clote, P.: Threshold logic proof systems. Manuscript (May 1995)

  7. Buss, S., Turán, G.: Resolution proofs of generalized pigeonhole principles. Theor. Comput. Sci.62: 311–317 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clote, P., Krajíček, J. (eds.): Arithmetic, Proof Theory and Computational Complexity, 428 p. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1993

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clote, P.: Cutting planes and constant depth Frege proofs. In: Proceedings of 7th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 296–307. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Science Press 1992

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clote, P.: Cutting plane and Frege proofs. Inf. Comput.121: 103–122 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cook, S.A., Reckhow, R.: On the relative efficiency of propositional proof systems. J. Symb. Logic44: 36–50 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cook, W., Coullard, C.R., Turan, G.: On the complexity of cutting plane proofs. Discr. Appl. Math.18: 25–38 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goerdt, A.: Cutting plane versus Frege proof systems. In: Börger, E. (ed.) Computer Science Logic 1990, vol. 552, pp 174–194. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1992

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haken, A.: The intractability of resolution. Theor. Comput. Sci.39: 297–305 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hardy, G.H., Wright, E.M.: An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 5th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1979

    Google Scholar 

  16. Impagliazzo, R., Pitassi, T., Urquhart, A.: Upper and lower bounds for tree-like cutting planes proofs. In: Proceedings of 9th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 220–228. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Science Press 1994

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krajíček, J.: On Frege and extended Frege systems. In: Clote, P., Remmel, J. (eds.) Feasible Mathematics, vol. II, pp. 284–319. Basel: Birkhäuser 1994

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papadimitriou, C.H.: On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence. J. Comput. System Sci.48:498–532 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Papadimitriou, C.H., Steiglitz, K.: Combinatorial Optimization. London: Prentice-Hall 1982

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paris, J.B., Wilkie, A.J.: Counting problems in bounded arithmetic. In: di Prisco, C.A. (ed.) Methods in Mathematical Logic, pp. 317–340. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1130. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1983

    Google Scholar 

  21. Urquhart, A.: Hard examples for resolution. J. Assoc. Comput. Machinery34: 209–219 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by NSF grant DMS-9205181 and by US-Czech Science and Technology Grant 93-205

Partially supported by NSF grant CCR-9102896 and by US-Czech Science and Technology Grant 93-205

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buss, S.R., Clote, P. Cutting planes, connectivity, and threshold logic. Arch Math Logic 35, 33–62 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01845704

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01845704

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation