Skip to main content
Log in

The logic of expert judging systems and the rights of the accused

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Schoenmakers, W.J. (1986). A Problem in Knowledge Acquisition,SIGART Newsletter. 95, 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pollock, J.L. (1987). Defeasible Reasoning,Cognitive Science. 11, 481–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ginsberg, M.L. (1986). Counterfactuals,Artificial Intelligence. 30, 35–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wellman, F.L. (1936).The Art of Cross-Examination. 4th edition. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fagin, R. and J.Y. Halpern (1987). Belief, Awareness, and Limited Reasoning,Artificial Intelligence. 34, 39–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinlan, J. (ed.) (1986).Applications of Expert Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Chapters 8, 9. (These chapters discuss learning expert system rules by induction from examples.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fulda, J.S. The logic of expert judging systems and the rights of the accused. AI & Soc 2, 266–269 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908551

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908551

Keywords