Skip to main content
Log in

Management of enterprise-wide systems integration programs

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Integration

Abstract

Automation and Information Systems play both tactical and strategic roles in the success of a business enterprise. They also pose an extremely challenging set of management issues concerned with the selection and management of technologies, management of the workforce to achieve successful implementation and operational use, and the integration of automation and information systems with business operations to capture the full benefits. Systems Integration programs involve high levels of technical and management risk commensurate with the significant business benefits that may be achieved. New and emerging automation and information technologies for Computer Integrated Manufacturing/Distribution, image processing, real-time transaction processing, and customer service cut across all organizational and functional units of an enterprise and require full system integration to capture their potential benefits. A wave of re-engineering programs are underway within commercial enterprises and the government to modify their business processes to take full competitive advantage of these technologies.

There are numerous examples of both well managed and hopelessly mangled systems integration programs in both the public and private sectors that lead to the need for better management approaches. The management of software development has been a particularly troublesome area. This article presents a general model of the management structure to implement a systems integration program, using an enterprise-wide Information Systems Architecture (ISA) as a roadmap, and supported by a defined set of measures and metrics. Standards, although no panacea for systems integratio, play an important role in the architectural framework.

The Information System Architecture approach described in this article is comprehensive in covering application software and data architecture as well as the computing and communications hardware infrastructure and other automation technologies that support the overall business process. The objective of the accompanying management model is to define a management structure, its essential functions, and methods that support a traditional systems development approach, as well as new approaches using prototyping and evolutionary development. Any of these management approaches require an ISA that is comprehensive in supporting business objectives, resilient in accommodating changing business conditions and technologies, and useful in producing a practical information architecture that can be applied to business operations. Examples of the ISA approach that support systems management are discussed for representative types of enterprise in the manufacturing sector and the service sector:

  1. (1)

    The Manufacturing/Distribution Enterprise example uses automated manufacturing and materials handling systems supported by MRPII software to integrate engineering, distribution, and financial systems; and

  2. (2)

    The Financial Services Enterprise example applies automated transaction processing using image processing and document management systems to achieve improved products and a more productive workflow with enhanced response to customers and/or clients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.K. Clemons, “Corporate strategies for information technolgy: a resource-based approach, computer”, November 1991, IEEE Computer Society.

  2. N.R. Augustine,Augustine's Laws, Viking, 1986.

  3. K.C. Hoffman and J. Melancon, “Information systems architecture for a manufacturing/distribution enterprise,”Proceedings, Manufacturing International '88 Conference, Atlanta, GA, 1988, pp. 245–254.

  4. K.C. Hoffman, “A model of program management functions and processes,” MITRE Working Paper, November 1991.

  5. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Application Portability Profile, The U.S. Governments Open System Environment Profile, OSE/1 Version 1.0, NIST Special Publication 500-187, 1991.

  6. B.W. Meister, “A performance study of the ISO transport protocol,”IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 40, no. 3, March 1991.

  7. B.M. Horowitz, Development of DOD C3I Systems Using Commercial Off-the-Shelf Products, The MITRE Corporation, October 1991.

  8. T.H. Johnson and T.A. May, Nolan Norton Institute, Managing Strategic Imaging Initiatives, December 1990.

  9. T. Iacobuzio, “Pioneers of outsourcing,”Insurance and Technology, September 1991.

  10. H. Kerzner,Project Management, Third Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989.

  11. Final Report, Go For 12 Program, U.S. General Services Administration, Information Resources Management Service, November 1988.

  12. H.P. Schultz, Software Management Metrics, M88-1, The MITRE Corporation, May 1988.

  13. T.B. Bollinger and C. McGowan, “A critical look at software capability evaluations,”IEEE Software, pp. 25–46, July 1991, IEEE.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffman, K.C. Management of enterprise-wide systems integration programs. Journal of Systems Integration 3, 201–224 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975514

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975514

Key Words

Navigation