Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nobel prizes

A bibliography of scientometric papers and data sources

  • Bibliography Section
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • AARONSON, S., The footnotes of science.Mosaic, 6 (1975) No. 2, 22–27. Also in: E. GARFIELD,Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 2, Institute for Scientific Information Press, Philadelphia, 1977, p. 286–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALLISON, P. D., Scientific elite — Nobel laureates in the United States (book review).Political Science Quarterly, 93 (1978) No. 2, 345–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANNAN, N. G., The intellectual aristocracy. In:Studies in Social History, J. H. PLUMB, (Ed.) Longmans—Green, London, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzahl der naturwissenschaftlichen Nobelpreise als Gradmesser naturwissenschaftlicher Produktivität.Umschau, 64 (1964) No. 12, 380.

  • ASTRACHAN, A., Dogma in the manger.New Yorker, 49 (1973) No. 31, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • BACKMAN, C. W., Scientific elite — Nobel laureates in the United States (book review).Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 435 (1978) No. 1, 335–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAGGE, E.,Die Nobelpreisträger der Physik, München, 1964.

  • BARBER, B.,Science and the Social Order, The Free Press, New York, 1952, p. 108

    Google Scholar 

  • BEN-DAVID, J., Fundamental Research and the Universities. OECD, Paris, 1968, p. 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • BEN-DAVID, J., The scientist's role in society — a comparative study. In:Foundations of Modern Sociology Series, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (N.J.), 1971, p. 186–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOBER, J.,Laureáti Nobelovy ceny (Nobel prize laureates), Obzor, Bratislava, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • CANTACUZENE, J.: Comment obtient-on un prix Nobel scientifique?Le Monde, (Nov. 2–3, 1969) 7.

  • COLE, J. R.: Patterns of intellectual influence in scientific research.Sociology of Education, 43 (1970) No. 4, 377–403. Translated in:Kommunikatsiya v sovremennoi nauke, E. M. MIRSKII, V. N. SADOVSKI (Eds.) Progress, Moskva, 1976, p. 390–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLE, S., COLE, J. R., Scientific output and recognition — A study in the operation of the reward system in seience.American Sociological Review, 32 (1967) No. 3, 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • COMFORT, A., Pop charts for science (letter).Nature, 227 (1970) No. 5262, 1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • CROOM, D. L., Dangers in the use of the Science Citation Index (letter).Nature, 227 (1970) No. 5263, 1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CUNY, HILAIRE,Nobel de la dynamite et les prix Nobel, Paris, 1970.

  • DIEMER, G., Creativity versusage (letter).Physics Today, 27 (1974) No. 8, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOROZYNS, A., Nobel-prize winners grapple with social and ethical problems facing science.Science Forum, 9 (1976) No. 1, 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • FARBER, E.,Nobel Prize Winners in Chemistry, 1901–1950, Henry Schuman, New York, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • FENNER, F. J., Australian aborgines, fore of Papua New Guinea, and 1976 Nobel prizes for medicine.Medical Journal of Australia, 2 (1977) No. 3, 73–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLEMING, D. H., Nobel's hits and errors.The Atlantic, 218 (1966) 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • FISCH, R., Psychology of science. In:Science, Technology and Society — A Cross-disciplinary Perspective, I. SPIEGEL-RÖSING, D. de S.PRICE (Eds), Sage Publications, London-Beverly Hills, 1977, p. 277–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOY, H. M., Foreign medical graduates and the Nobel prize.Journal of the American Medical Association, 235 (1976) No. 20, 2191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FRAME, J. D., NARIN, F., The international distribution of biomedical publications,Federation Proceedings, 36 (1977) No. 6, 1790–1795.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRAME, J. D., NARIN, F., CARPENTER, M. P., The distribution of world science.Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) No. 4, 501–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • French Nobelist musketeers.Medical Tribune, (Jan. 5, 1966) 4.

  • FRIEDLOVÁ, H., Nobel prizes (in Czech).Vesmir, 43 (1964) No. 12, 357–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., Citation indexes in sociological and historical research.American Documentation, 14 (1963) No. 3, 289–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., Objective estimate of creativity (letter).Chemical and Engineering News, 44 (1966) No. 46, 6. Also in: E. GARFIELD, Citation measures used as an objective estimate of creativity,Current Contents, (1970) No. 34, 4–5. Also in: E. GARFIELD,Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, Institute for Scientific Information Press, Philadelphia, 1977, p. 120–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., Citatition indexing, historio-bibliography, and the sociology of science. In:Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Medical Librarianship, Amsterdam, 1969, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1970, p. 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., Citation measures used as an objective estimate of creativity,Current Contents, (1970) No. 34, 4–5. Also in: E. GARFIELD,Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, Institute for Scientific Information Press, Philadelphia, 1977, p. 120–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., Citation indexing for studying science.Current Contents, (1970) No. 46, M 13. Also in: E. GARFIELD,Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, Institute for Scientific Information Press, Philadelphia, 1977, p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., Citation indexing for studying science.Nature, 227 (1970) No. 5259, 669–671. Also in:Current Contents, (1970) No. 46, M14–M19. Also in: E. GARFIELD,Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, Institute for Information Science Press, Philadelphia, 1977, p. 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., Citation and distinction (letter).Nature, 242 (1973) No. 5398, 485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., More on forecasting Nobel prizes and the most cited scientists of 1972.Current Contents, (1973) No. 40, 5–7. Also in: E. GARFIELD,Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, Institute for Scientific Press, Philadelphia, 1977, p. 487–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., Highly cited articles. 38. Physics and chemistry papers published in the 1970s.Current Contents, (1977) No. 23, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., The 250 most-cited primary authors, 1961–1975. 2. The correlation between citedness, Nobel prizes, and academy membership.Current Contents, (1977) No. 50, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., The 300 most-cited authors, 1961–1976, including co-authors at last. 1.How the names were selected.Current Contents, (1978) No. 28, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., MALIN, M. V., Can Nobel prize winners be predicted? 135th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Dallas, 1968.

  • GARFIELD, E., SHER, I. H., New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing.American Documentation, 14 (1963) No. 4, 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E., SHER, I. H., TORPIE, R. J., The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARRAIT, G. R. M., Telegraphy. In:A History of Technology, C. SINGER, E. J. HOLMYARD, A. R. HALL, T. I. WILLIAMS, (Eds), Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, New York-London, p. 659.

  • GRANOVSKII, YU. V., DUZHENKO L. V., LYUBIMOVA T. N., MAKSIMOVA E. P. MURASHOVA T. I., STRAKHOV A. B., Applying the statistics of prizes and patents to evaluate research development (in Russian). In:Naukometricheskie issledovaniya v khimii, Khimicheskii fakultet, Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1974, p. 122–130.

  • GRAY, G. W., The Nobel prizes.Scientific American, 181 (1949) No. 12, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAY, G. W., Which scientists win Nobel prizes?Harpers, 222 (1961) 78–82. Also in:The Sociology of Science, B. BARBER, W. HIRSCH (Eds), The Free Press, New York, 1962, p. 557–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAGSTROM, W. O.,The Scientific Community, Basic Books, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEATHCOTE, N. H. de V.,Nobel Prize Winner in Physics, 1901–1950. Henry Schumann, New York, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • HECHT, F., et al., Et al. gets Nobel prize.New England Journal of Medicine, 294 (1977) 2341.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUBERT, J. J. Applications of mathematics-statistical science and society. Statistical Series 75, University of Guelph (Ont.) 1978, p. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • INHABER, H., PRZEDNOWEK, K., Quality of research and the Nobel prizes.Social Studies of Science, 6 (1976) No. 1, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Italian Nobel prizes.Italy, (1976) No. 4, 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • JEVONS, F. R.,Science Observed-Science as a Social and Intellectual Activity, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, 1975, p. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • JUNGK, R., Soll man die Nobelpreise abschaffen?Bild der Wissenschaft, 12 (1975) No. 10, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAPLAN, F.,Nobel Prize Winners-Charts, Indexes, Sketches, Nobelle, Chicago, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • KHRAMOV, YU. A.,Fiziki-biograficheskii spravochnik (Physicists-biographical manual), Naukova dumka, Kiev, 1977, p. 492–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • KŘIŽOVÁ, E., Intragenerational mobility of scientists-Nobel laureates (in Czech).Teorie a metoda, 5 (1975) No. 1, 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • LARSEN, C. W., The care and feeding of Nobel prize winners (mimeographed address, Detroit, 1967). University of Chicago, Chicago, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVITAN, T.,The Laureates-Jewish Winners of the Nobel Prize. Twayne, New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • LITELL, R. J., The Nobel establishment — a rare glimpse.Scientific Research, 2 (Oct. 1967) 48–50, 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUKASIEWICZ, J., The handicap race of science-Nobel awards in science and medicine.American Scientist, 54 (1966), No. 3, 285A-286A.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCOLLUM, T., TAYLOR, S.,The Nobel Prize Winners 1901–1932, Central European Times, Zurich, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • MANNICHE, E., FALK, G., Age and the Nobel prize.Behavioral Science, 2 (1957) No. 4, 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • McELHENY, V. K., France considers significance of Nobel awards.Science, 150 (1965) No. 3699, 1013–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEADOWS, A. J.,Communication in Science, Butterworths, London, 1974, p. 39, 42, 188, 190.

    Google Scholar 

  • MERTON, R. K., Priorities in scientific discovery.American Sociological Review, 22 (1957) No. 6, 635–659. Also in: R. K. MERTON,The Sociology of Science —Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, N. W. STORER (Ed.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London, 1973, p. 286–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • MERTON, R. K., Continuities in the theory of social structure and anomie. In:Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, New York, 1968, p. 215–248 (at p. 228).

    Google Scholar 

  • MERTON, R. K., Continuities in the theory of reference groups and social structure. In:Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, New York, 1968, p. 335–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • MERTON, R. K., The Matthew effect in science,Science, 159 (1968) No. 3810, 56–63. Also in: R. K. MERTON,The Sociology of Science-Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, H. W. STORER (Ed.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London, 1973, p. 439–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • MERTON, R. K.,The Sociology of Science-Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, N. W. STORER (Ed.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London, 1973, p. 301, 440–443, 453–457, 511, 529–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOULIN, L., The Nobel prizes for science from 1901–1950, an essay in sociological analysis.British Journal of Sociology, 6 (1955) No. 3, 246–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • MUL'CHENKO, Z. M.: How to evaluate a scientist' work (in Czech).Vesmír, 48 (1969), No. 11, 323.

    Google Scholar 

  • MUL'CHENKO, Z. M.: GRANOVSKII, Yu. V., STRAKHOV, A. B., On scientometric characteristics of information activities of leading scientists. In:Problems of Information User Needs, A. I. MIKHAILOV (Ed.), FID-VINITI, Moskva, 1973, p. 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • MULKAY, M. J., Sociology of the scientific research community. In:Science, Technology and Society — A Cross-disciplinary Perspective, I. SPIEGEL-RÖSING, D. de S. PRICE (Eds.), Sage Publications, London-Beverly Hills, 1977, p. 93–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • NALIMOV, V. V., MUL'CHENKO, Z. M.,Naukometriya (Scientometrics), Nauka, Moskva, 1969, p. 121, 125, 152, 162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobel Foundation Calendar 1978–1979. Nobel Foundation, Stockholm, 1978 (and earlier editions).

  • Nobel Lectures in Physics 1901 to 1962, Vols. 1–3, Elsevier, New York, 1964.

  • Nobel lectures 1942–1962, Amsterdam-London-New York, 1964.

  • Nobel — The Man and His Prizes, H. R. SCHÜCK et al. (Eds), University of Oklahoma Press, Norman (Okla), 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobel — The Man and His Prizes, Elsevier, London, 1962.

  • Nobel (prix).Grand Larousse Encyclopédique, Librairie Larousse, Paris, e. g. 1963, Vol. 7, p. 786–787 etc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobel (prix).Larousse du XX e Siècle. Librairie Larousse, Paris, e. g. 1932, Vol. 5, p. 92–93, etc.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nobel prizes.The Encyclopedia Americana, Americana Corporation, New York-Chicago-Washington, e. g. 1959, Vol. 20, p. 393–395, etc.

  • Nobel prizes.Encyclopedia Britannica, Encyclopedia Britannica, Ltd., Chicago, London-Toronto, e. g. 1960, Vol. 16, p. 477–477B, 1967, Vol. 16, p. 549–551, etc.

  • Nobel prizes.World Who's Who in Science — From Antiquity to the Present, A. G. DEBUS et al., Marquis-Who's Who, Inc., Chicago, e. g. 1968, 2 cover pages, etc.

  • Nobel Winners. L. J. LUDOVICI (Ed.), Associated Booksellers, Westport (Conn.), 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobelpreis, Nobelpreisträger.Brockhaus Enzyklopädie, e. g. 17th Edition, F. A. Brockhaus, Wiesbaden, 1971, Vol. 13, p. 495–497, etc. Nobelpreise 1945–1962.Umschau, 64 (1964) No. 1, 16–17.

  • OLIVER, H., Creativity in physical sciences —interviews with some Nobel laureates.Interchange, 8 (1978) No. 4, 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OLIVER, P. T. P., Citation indexing for studying science (letter).Nature, 227 (1970), No. 5260, 870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OWENS, A. J., Will zero-population growth hamper scientific creativity? (letter).Physics Today, 26 (1973) No. 10, 9, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRICE, D. J. de S.,Little Science Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York-London, 1963, p. 36, 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les Prix Nobel. Norstedt, Stockholm, 1901-

  • QURASHI, M. M., Optimum ages fro productivity and recognition in science — Part 1.Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences, 10 (1973) No. 1, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • QURASHI, M. M., More on creativity.Physics Today, 29 (1976) No. 7, 13, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recognition of Excellence, A. YARMOLINSKY (Ed.), Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • REIF, A. E., Rating research proposals (letter).Chemical and Engineering News, 44 (1966) No. 35, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Répartition par sexe des principaux prix scientifiques et des membres des academies des sciences du quelques pays.Impact Science et Sociètè, 25 (1975) No. 2, 162.

  • RICHET, C., Science francaise et science allemande. In: Les Allemands et la science, M. LEUDET, G. PETIT (Eds.), Alcan, Paris, 1916 p. 345–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHTER, M. N., Scientific elite — Nobel laureates in the United States (book review).Sociology and Social Research, 62 (1978) No. 3, 502–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • RONDEST, J., Les coulisses du prix Nobel.La Recherche, (1971) No. 16, 811–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSE, S., American Nobel elite (book review).Nature, 270 (1977) No. 5633, 116–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SACHTLEBEN, R., Nobel prize winners descended from Liebig.Journal of Chemical Education, 35 (1958) No. 2, 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • SALOMON, J. J., Science policy studies and the development of science policy. In:Science, Technology and Society — A Crossdisciplinary Perspective, I. SPIEGEL-RÖSING, D. de S. PRICE (Eds.), Sage Publications, London-Beverly Hills, 1977, p. 43–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMPSON, C., The Nobel prize.Industrial Research, 7 (1965) No. 1, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • SÁNDOR, L. N., Statements of Nobel-prize and Lenin-prize winners on the situation, prospects, and ethical questions of science (in Hungarian).Magyar Tudomány, 79/17 (1972) No. 2, 108–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHIMANSKI, F., The Nobel experience — the decision-makers.New Scientist, 64 (1974) No. 917, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHAPLEY, D., Nobelists — Piccioni lawsuit raises questions about the 1959 prize.Science, 176 (1972) No. 4042, 1405–1406.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHER, I. H., GARFIELD, E., New tools for improving and evaluating the effectiveness of research. In:Research Program Effectiveness, A. C. YOVITS et al. (Eds.), Gordon and Breach, New York, 1966, p. 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHERWOOD, M., The Nobel experience — life at the top.New Scientist, 64 (1974) No. 917, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • SILCOCK, B., Playing the Nobel status game.The Sunday Times, (Nov. 12, 1967).

  • SIMMEL, G., Numerical aspects of prominent group members. In:The Sociology of George Simmel, K. WOLFF (Ed.) trans., Free Press, New York, 1950, p. 97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPERBER, M. A., Freud, Tausk, and the Nobel prize complex.Psychoanalytical Review, 53 (1972) No. 2, 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPERBER, M. A., Symbiotic psychosis and the need for fame.Psychoanalytic Review, 61 (1974–1975) No. 4, 517–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEVENSON, L. G.,Nobel Prize Winners in Medicine and Physiology, 1901–1950, Henry Schuman, New York, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • STUCKEY, W., Swedish secret — How to win the Nobel prize.Science Digest, 78 (Oct. 1975) 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suit over a Nobel prize.New Scientist, 55 (1972) No. 803, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • SULLIVAN, W., Who invented the laser?New York Times, (Jan. 16, 1966), E7.

  • TARTAKOFF, H., The normal personality in our culture and the “Nobel prize complex”. In:Psychoanalysis — A General Psychology, Essays in Honor of Heinz Hartmann, R. M. LOEWENSTEIN, L. M. NEWMAN, M. SCHUR, A. SOLNIT (Eds.), International Universities Press Inc., New York, 1966, p. 222–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • TSANG, T., Creativity versus age (letter).Physics Today, 27 (1974) No. 8, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • VARSHAVSKII, K. M., PANAEVA, N. P., Statistics of awards as a scientometric source (in Russian). In:Problemy deyatel'nosti uchenogo i nauchnykh kollektivov, Vyp. 4, Nauka, Leningrad, 1971, p. 214–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • VLACHÝ, J., Nobel prizes again to older physicists (in Czech).Československý časopis profysiku, A 21 (1971) No. 4, 475–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • VLACHÝ, J., Interdisciplinarita ve vědě (Interdisciplinarity in science). Institute for Philosophy and Sociology, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Praha, 1973, p. 96, 100, fig. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • WADE, N., Citation analysis — a new tool for science administrators.Science, 188 (1975) No. 4187, 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • WAKSMAN, A.,My Life with Microbes, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1954, p. 279-

    Google Scholar 

  • WATSON, J. D.,Double Helix, Athaneum, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILSON, M., How Nobel prizewinners get that way.Atlantic Monthly, 224 (1969) 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalow wins half of Nobel prize in medicine.Physics Today, 30 (1977) No. 12, 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • YAMADA, K., OTAKI, E., Life cycle of basic research — an approach to the quantitative analysis of R&D activity.Research Policy, 1 (1971) No. 4, 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZIMAN, J., Scientific elite (book review).New Scientist, 76 (1977) No. 1074, 170–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZUCKERMAN, H., Patterns of collaboration of Nobel laureates and some effects of the prize. Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1964.

  • ZUCKERMAN, H., Nobel laureates in science — patterns of productivity, collaborations and authorship.American Sociological Journal, 32 (1967) No. 3, 391–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZUCKERMAN, H., The sociology of the Nobel prizes.Scientific American, 217 (1967) No. 11, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZUCKERMAN, H., Stratification in American science.Sociological Inquiry, 40 (1970) 235–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZUCKERMAN, H., Interviewing an ultra-elite.Public Opinion Quarterly, 36 (1972) No. 2, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZUCKERMAN, H.,Scientific Elite — Nobel Laureates in the United States, The Free Press, New York — Collier Macmillan Publishers, London, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZUCKERMAN, H., MERTON, R. K., Age, aging and age structure in science. In:Aging and Society, Vol. 3 —A Sociology of Age Stratification, M. W. RILEY, M. JOHNSON, A. FONER, (Eds.), Russel Sage Foundation, New York, 1972. Also in: R. K. MERTON,The Sociology of Science — Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, N. W. STORER (Ed.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London, 1973, p. 497–559 (at. p. 511, 529–530).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kaňkovského 1241, Praha 8, (Czechoslovakia)

    J. Vlachý

Authors
  1. J. Vlachý
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vlachý, J. Nobel prizes. Scientometrics 1, 295–301 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016314

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016314

Search

Navigation