Abstract
Primary papers of international relevance do not always get published in media which have good international dissemination. Samples of literature in animal science, judged by scientists active in that subject field, indicate that this discrepancy may be a truly serious one.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
A. A. MANTEN, Structure of papers in animal science and implications in journal management.Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1 (1978) 85–92.
A. A. MANTEN, Communication in animal science. In:Domestication, Conservation and Use of Animal Resources — World Animal Science L. J. PEEL, D. E. TRIBE (Eds.), Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam (in press).
A. A. MANTEN, Major communication media in animal science. In:Domestication, Conservation and Use of Animal Resources — World Animal Science, L. J. PEEL, D. E. TRIBE (Eds.), Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam (in press).
D. DAVIDSON, The effect of individual differences of cognitive style on judgements of document relevance.J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci., 28 (5) (1977) 273–284.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manten, A.A. Publication of scientific information is not identical with communication. Scientometrics 2, 303–308 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016350
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016350