Skip to main content
Log in

An indicator of cross-disciplinary research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study of interdisciplinary research processes and performance is hampered by a lack of data. This project investigated possible indicators based in the open scientific literature to measure such processes. Focusing on theJournal Citation Reports as a suitable data base, alternative indicators were validated on a sample of 383 articles drawn from 19 journals. The results support the use ofCitations Outside Category as an indicator of cross-disciplinary research activity. An estimated version of this indicator is used to examine three research categories — Demography, Operations Research/Management Science, and Toxicology — as to the extent of cross-disciplinary citation occurring by the journals in these categories and to them. Results suggest thatCitations Outside Category can be a quite informative bibliometric measure. A key substantive finding is that citation across broad field categories (engineering, life sciences, physical sciences, and social sciences) is extremely infrequent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. E. CHUBIN, A. L. PORTER, F. A. ROSSINI, T. CONNOLLY, Indicators of interdisciplinary research, Report to the National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies, Grant No. SRS-810566, Washington, D. C., 1983.

  2. A. L. PORTER, F. A. ROSSINI, Interdisciplinary research redefined: Multi-skill, problem-focussed research in the STRAP framework,R & D Management 14 (April 1984) 105.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. H. BIRNBAUM, Academic interdisciplinary research: problems and practice,R & D Management, 10 (179) 17.

  4. F. A. ROSSINI, A. L. PORTER, P. KELLY, D. E. CHUBIN, Interdisciplinary integration within technology assessments.Knowledge, 2 (1981) 503.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. E. CHUBIN, S. D. MOITRA, Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?,Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 423.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. O. EDGE, R. M. MACLEOD, (eds), Special issue: Citation studies of scientific specialties,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977).

  7. F. NARIN,Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. New Jersey, Computer Horizons, Inc., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. DE SOLLA PRICE, The analysis of square matrices of scientometric transactions,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. GARFIELD, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation,Science, 178 (3 November 1972) 471.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. E. CHUBIN, Beyond invisible colleges: A bibliographic essay in: D. E. CHUBIN,Sociology of Sciences: An Annotated Bibliography on Invisible Colleges, 1972–1981, New York: Garland, 1983, p. 3–63.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. A. ROSSINI, A. L. PORTER, Interdisciplinary research: Performance and policy issues,Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 13 (1981) 8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porter, A.L., Chubin, D.E. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics 8, 161–176 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016934

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016934

Keywords

Navigation