Abstract
The theoretical introductions in empirical journal articles have been analyzed looking for factors determining citation habits. Own-country-biases and English-American predominance in citations were not regularly found. Preferred language of the cited publications and absolute citation frequencies were dependent upon both the disciplines and the countries where the journals are published. However, relative citation frequencies (citations related to the length of the text available) have been found to be rather constant across countries (within psychology and psychiatry, respectively) which indicates no such dependence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. GARFIELD, Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 359.
J. H. BECKER, Wen interessiert die deutsche Sozialpsychologie? Rezipienten und Rezipiertes der “Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie”,Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 12 (1981) 325.
H. ENGELBERT, Wissenschaftsmetrische Untersuchungen der internationalen Informationsflüsse auf dem Gebiet der Informatik und Wissenschaftswissenschaft,Informatik, 28 (1981) 40.
J. BORTZ,Lehrbuch der Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lange, L. Effects of disciplines and countries on citation habits. An analysis of empirical papers in behavioural sciences. Scientometrics 8, 205–215 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016936
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016936