Skip to main content
Log in

Conferences and courses on biotechnology. Describing scientific communication by exploratory methods

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of conferences, courses, workshops, and other kinds of scientific meetings is still growing, especially in highly dynamic or multidisciplinary fields of knowledge. Since these meetings are usually the first occasion of communicating scientific findings, it seems worthwhile to use data on conferences in order to depict trends in science and technology, at an early point of time. Nevertheless, only a few studies on these types of scientific and technological communication were undertaken until now. One prominent example for the relevance of conferences and for the necessity of some monitoring is the field of the “new” biotechnology. We followed a “conference approach” by using data on 4,674 meetings that took place in the time span 1984–90. Content analytic methods (a coding scheme of 70 categories) seemed to be appropriate, according to the textual type of data (information about the meetings, mostly programs). Distributions of categories show specific features and multiple correspondence analyses of concatenated Burt matrices of the categories, differentiated to the years provide a broad overview of biotechnological conferences and other types of meetings in the eighties. Connections between fields of knowledge and applications or certain characteristics of the meetings can be summarized in five clusters of features which are relatively stable within the time frame of investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U. Schmoch, H. Grupp, W. Mannsbart, B. Schwitalla,Technikprognosen mit Patentindikatoren, Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Cologne, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Lin, W. D. Garvey, C. E. Nelson, A Study of the communication structure of science, In:C. E. Nelson, D. K. Pollock (Eds),Communication Among Scientists and Engineers, Lexington, Heath Lexington Books, 1970, p. 23–59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. H. Oseman,Conferences and their Literature, The Library Association, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Schubert, S. Zsindely, T. Braun, Scientometric analysis of attendance at international scientific meetings,Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Kranakis, L. Leydesdorff, Teletraffic conferences: Studying a field of engineering science,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 563–591.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For surveys of economic activities and impacts of biotechnology on the international level cf. Office of Technology Assessment, Biotechnology in a Global Economy, Washington, D. C., 1991 and OECD, Biotechnology: Economic and Wider Impacts, Paris, 1989.

  7. See Commission des Communautés Européennes, Europe 1995. Mutations technologiques & enjeux sociaux. Rapport FAST, Paris, 1983, for a justification of the term“new” biotechnology and a description of its multidisciplinary scientific foundation and its multiple potential for application; cf.R. Bud, Biotechnology in the twentieth century,Social Studies of Science, 21 (1991) 415–457 for a history of the term biotechnology at the boundary of biology and engineering.

  8. A. Crafts-Lighty,Information Sources in Biotechnology 1986, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, p. 97.

  9. The database “Conf” containing information about forthcoming and past conferences in science and technology (available at STN International) allows for a search for the keyword “Bio-engineering including biotechnology”. When we set up a search at the end of 1991, 552 entries were retrieved for the time period 1984 and after. In our data collection process for the same period, we identified meetings in biotechnology exceeding this number by the factor 10, see below for the number of meetings in the period 1984–1990.

  10. G. Hillyer, Announcements of forthcoming meetings, In:G. J. Zamora, M. C. Adamson (Eds),Conference Literature: Its Role in the Distribution of Information, Learned Information, Marlton, NJ, p. 50, cf. also the other contributions on sources of conference announcements byM. L. Pflueger, R. Jerrill, andR. J. Taylor,ibid. Announcements of forthcoming meetings, In:G. J. Zamora, M. C. Adamson (Eds),Conference Literature: Its Role in the Distribution of Information, Learned Information, Marlton, NJ, p. 50.

  11. R. P. Weber,Basic Content Analysis, 2nd ed., Sage, Newbury Park, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Früh,Inhaltsanalyse, 2nd ed., Ölschläger, Munich, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Bos, C. Tarnai, (Eds),Angewandte Inhaltsanalyse in Empirischer Pädagogik und Psychologie, Waxman, Münster, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. J. Greenacre,Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, London, Academic Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Lebart, A. Salem,Analyse statistisque des données textuelles, Dunod, Paris, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. O. Hill, Correspondence analysis: A neglected multivariate method,Applied Statistics, 23 (1974) 340–354.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Gifi,Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis, Wiley, Chichester, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. G. M. van der Heijden, A. de Falguerolles, J. de Leeuw, A combined approach to contingency table analysis using correspondence analysis and log-linear analysis,Applied Statistics, 38 (1989) 249–292.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martens, B., Saretzki, T. Conferences and courses on biotechnology. Describing scientific communication by exploratory methods. Scientometrics 27, 237–260 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016941

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016941

Keywords

Navigation