Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Operationalizing developments in a problem field: The case of MBD

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the most part scientific developments in problem fields result in increasing specification of research problems. With respect to the problem of Minimal Brain Dysfunction, however, the reverse trend can be observed. In the case of the occurrence of behavioural problems related tominimal brain dysfunction, scientific developments resulted in a more diffuse formulation because of the nature of this problem. In the paper co-word analysis methodology is used to study changes in the structure of networks around central terms in this field for the period 1970–1984. It is apparent that central terms in the field are not able to “funnel the interests” in the field despite the growing number of scientific articles written on the subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. M. CALLON, J. LAW, A. RIP,Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Macmillan, London, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. CALLON, B. LATOUR, Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so in: K. KNORR-CETINA, A. CICOUREL,Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.

  3. A. F. KALVERBOER ‘MBD: Discussion of the concept’, in: A. F. KALVERBOER, H. M. Van PRAAG, J. MENDLEWICZ,Minimal Brain Dysfunction: Fact or Fiction, S. Karger, Basel, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. CALLON, J.-P. COURTIAL, W. A. TURNER, S. BAUIN, From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to coword analysis,Social Science Information, 22 (1983) 191–235.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L.C. FREEMAN, Centrality in social networks. I. Conceptual clarification,Social Networks, 1 (1978) 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Only in some cases, the three measures are equal:viz. when there are no relations at all(0); in the case of a startype network(1); in the case of a circle(0); and in the case of a complete network(1). See FREEMAN,op. cit., Centrality in social networks. I. Conceptual clarification,Social Networks, 1 (1978): 232–236.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. FLECK,Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Studies Unit/Dept. of Social Policy, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

    W. Van Rossum

Authors
  1. W. Van Rossum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Rossum, W. Operationalizing developments in a problem field: The case of MBD. Scientometrics 15, 509–526 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017068

Keywords

Search

Navigation