Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in publication patterns of biotechnologists: An evaluation of the impact of government stimulation programs in six industrial nations

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of a government stimulation program on the development of Dutch biotechnology have been studied scientometrically in comparison with world-wide averages, and with the effects of programs of five important large Western industrial nations, in the period 1976–1985. In two priority fields of the Dutch programme, fermentation and bio-industrial chemistry, and biochemical genetics, publication rates were below world average before 1980–1981, but reached levels significantly above world average in 1984–1985. Both in 1980 and 1984, Dutch articles were characterized by a relatively high short-term impact. In 1984, the impact of Dutch articles was slightly above the 1980 level. When publications were counted in a core set of 19 biotechnology relevant journals, the share of Dutch biotechnologists did not change between 1979–1982 and 1983–1986, while Canada, Japan, France, and, to some extent, the UK, improved their positions, but the Federal Republic of Germany lost some ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. T. BULL, G. HOLT, M. D. LILLY,Biotechnology. International trends and perspectives. Paris, OECD, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. MURRAY, L. TEICHNER, An assessment of the global potential of genetic engineering in the agribusiness sector, Chicago, Policy Research Corporation and Chicago Group Inc., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. RIP, A. J. NEDERHOF, Between dirigism and laissez-faire: Effects of implementing the science policy priority for biotechnology in the Netherlands,Research Policy, 15 (1986)

  4. A. J. NEDERHOF, F. L. LEEUW, P. D. BAK, R. F. MEIJER, G. T. P. RUIVENKAMP, Evaluatie van het beleidsinstrument ‘Innovatiegericht Onderzoeksprogramma biotechnologie’ (IOPb), Leiden, LISBON, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. RIP, A. J. NEDERHOF,Stimulering van de biotechnologie in Nederland: Effecten op het wetenschappelijke veld, The Hague, Staatsuitgeverij, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Programmacommissie Biotechnologie,Innovatieprogramma biotechnologie. Kader, hoofdlifnen, operationeel plan, The Hague, Staatsuitgeverij, 1982.

  7. A. J. NEDERHOF, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: A comparison of cum laude doctorates with ordinary doctorates in physics,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 329.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. C. SMITH, P. M. D. COLLINS, D. M. HICKS, S. WYATT, National performance in basic research,Nature, 323 (1986) 681.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nederhof, A.J. Changes in publication patterns of biotechnologists: An evaluation of the impact of government stimulation programs in six industrial nations. Scientometrics 14, 475–485 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017103

Keywords

Navigation