Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of the mentor on the academic career

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mentor plays an important role in initiating a process of cumulative advantage for the student. Our analyses present a clear and systematic pattern of effects of the mentor on the careers of biochemists. The influence of the mentor begins with collaboration, which is the single most important factor affecting the student's predoctoral productivity. For those who collaborate, the effects of both eminence and performance further increase the student's predoctoral productivity. The mentor's performance has weak effects on the productivity of noncollaborating students. For those who collaborate with their mentor, the mentor continues to influence the career with a positive effect of the mentor's performance on academic placement, an effect not found for noncollaborators. Even though the mentor's performance affects the student's placement, the student's performances doesnot affect that placement, suggesting a process of ascription. For those who collaborate with their mentor, the mentor's performance increases the student's later publications and citations. For noncollaborators, whose mentors are much less productive during the student's period of doctoral study, the mentor's eminence has a smaller, but significant effect on later productivity. Overall, the advantages of a strong mentor are drawn upon and enhanced through processes of both achievement and ascription.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. ZUCKERMAN, Stratification in American Science, Pp. 235–257, in: E. O. LAUMANN (Ed.),Social Stratification, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1970 p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. POLANYI,The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday & Company, Garden City, NY, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. E. CHUBIN,Social Trappings of Knowledge, Book manuscript under review, 1980.

  4. M. OVERINGTON, The Scientific Community as Audience: Toward a Rhetorical Analysis of Science,Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10 (1977) 145.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. G. BROWN,The Mobile Professors, American Council on Education, Washington, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. R. COLE, S. COLE,Social Stratification in Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973, p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. CAPLOW, R. McGEE,The Academic Mareketplace, Doubleday, Garden City, NY, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. L. HARGENS, W. O. HAGSTROM, Sponsored and Contest Mobility of American Academic Scientists,Sociology of Education, 40 (1967) 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. H. TURNER, Sponsored and Contest Mobility and the School System,American Sociological Review, 25 (1960) 855–867.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. ZUCKERMAN,Scientific Elite, The Free Press, New-York 1977, 207.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. BERELSON,Graduate Education in the United States, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. F. RESKIN, Academic Sponsorship and Scientists Careers,Sociology of Education, 52 (1979) 131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. ZUCKERMAN, R. K. MERTON, Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, Structure and Functions of the Referee System,Minerva, 9 (1971) 66–100.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. ZUCKERMAN, R. K. MERTON, Age, Aging and Age Structure in Science, Pp. 292–356, in: M. W. RILEY et al. (Eds),Aging and Society: Volume III,A Theory of Age Stratification, Russel Sage Foundation, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. S. LONG, Productivity and Academic Position in the Scientific Career,American Sociological Review, 43 (1978) 889–908.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. S. LONG, P. D. ALLISON, R. McGINNIS, Entrance into the Academic Career,American Sociological Review, 44 (1979) 816–830.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. McGINNIS, P. D. ALLISON, J. S. LONG, Postdoctoral Training in Bioscience,Social Forces, 60 (1981) 701–722.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. S. LONG, R. McGINNIS Organizational Context and Scientific Productivity,American Sociological Review, 46 (1981) 422–442.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19xx American Men (and Women) of Science, R. R. Bowker Co., Cattel Press New York.

  20. A. M. CARTTER,An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education, American Council on Education, Washington, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. D. ROOSE, D. J. ANDERSEN,A Rating of Graduate Programs, American Council on Education, Washington, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. W. ASTIN,Predicting Academic Performance in College, Free Press, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 19xx Science Citation Index, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia.

  24. J. S. LONG, R. McGINNIS, P. D. ALLISON, The Problem of Junior-authored Papers in constructing Citation Counts,Social Studies of Science, 10 (1980) 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. L. HARGENS, G. M. FARR, An Examination of Recent Hypotheses about Institution Inbreeding,American Journal of Sociology, 78 (1973) 1381–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. S. LONG,A Simple Probability Model for Collaboration, Research Note, Washington State University, 1983.

  27. R. J. WONNACOTT, T. H. WONNACOTT,Econometric Theory, Wiley, New York, 1979, 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. O. HAGSTROM, Traditional and Modern Forms of Scientific Teamwork,Administrative Science Quarterly 9 (1964) 241–263.

    Google Scholar 

  29. W. O. HAGSTROM,The Scientific Community, Basic Books, New-York 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. O. HAGSTROM, Inputs, Aoutputs and the Prestige of University Science Departments,Sociology of Education, 44 (1971), 375–397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Long, J.S., McGinnis, R. The effects of the mentor on the academic career. Scientometrics 7, 255–280 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017149

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017149

Keywords

Navigation