Abstract
This paper describes the mainstream scientific output of the scientific communities of four newly industrializing Asian countries (Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan) and considers its adequacy for describing local scientific activities in biochemistry, biology, physics, electrical engineering, and computer science. An examination of non mainstream scientific literature in these specialties shows that a high proportion of non mainstream authors also publish in mainstream literature. Data concerning degree of parochialism, age of references and use of vernacular literature are examined. The paper argues that it is misleading to characterize these peripheral scientific communities as principally stratified in function of local scientists' participation in mainstream science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. ARUNACHALAM, 1987. “The Links between Mainstream Science and Journals on the Periphery”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Council of Biology Editors, Vancouver, May 1987.
S. ARUNACHALAM, 1985a. “Citation Counts as Indicators of the Science and Technology Capacity of Third World Nations”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, May 1985, Los Angeles.
S. ARUNACHALAM, K. C. GARG, 1986. Science on the periphery: A scientometric analysis of science in the ASEAN countries,Journal of Information Science, 12, 105–117.
M. A. H. CAGNIN, 1985. Patterns of research in chemistry in Brazil,Interciencia, 10(2), 64–77.
M. CARPENTER, F. NARIN, 1980. The subject composition of the world's scientific journals,Scientometrics, 2 (1), 53–63.
Y. CHATELIN, R. ARVANITIS 1988.Stratégies Scientifiques et Développment — Sols et Agriculture des Régions Chaudes. Paris, Editions de l'ORSTOM.
H. T. CHRISTOVAO, 1985. The aging of the literature of biomedical sciences in developed and developing countries,Scientometrics, 7 (3–6), 411–430.
Ch. H. DAVIS, 1983. Institutional sectors of “Mainstream” science production in Subsaharan Africa, 1970–1979: A quantitative analysis,Scientometrics, 5 (3), 163–175.
Th. O. EISEMON, 1985. “Improving Measurement of the Scientific Activity of Third World Countries”, Philadelphia Workshop on Strengthening the Coverage of Third World Science, July.
Th. O. EISEMON, 1982.The Science Profession in the Third World, New York, Praeger.
Th. O. EISEMON, 1979. The implantation of science in Nigeria and Kenya”,Minerva, 27, 504–526.
Th. O. EISEMON, Ch. H. DAVIS, 1988. “Publication Strategies of Scientists in Four Peripheral Asian Scientific Communities: Some Issues in the Measurement and Interpretation of Non Mainstream Science”, In: P. ALBACH et al., (Eds),Scientific Development and Higher Education in Newly Industrialized Countries, New York and London, Praeger Publishers.
D. FRAME, 1985. Problems in the use of literature-based S&T indicators in developing countries, in:Science and Technology Indicators for Development, HIROKO MORITA-LOU (Ed.), Boulder and London, Westview, 117–122.
J. GAILLARD, 1987.Les chercheurs des pays en dévelopement. Origines, formations et pratiques de la recherche, Paris, Editions de l'ORSTOM.
E. GARFIELD, 1983. Mapping science in the Third World,Science and Public Polic, 10(3), 112–127.
M. D. GORDON, 1979. Deficiencies of scientific information access and output in less developed countries,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(6), 240–252.
L. A. LOMNITZ, M. W. REES, L. CAMEO, 1987. Publication and referencing patterns in a Mexican research institute,Social Studies of Science, 17, 115–133.
A. A. MANTEN, 1980. Publication of scientific information is not identical with communication,Scientometrics, 2(4), 303–308.
M. MORAVCSIK, 1985a.Strengthening the Coverage of Third World Sciencce. International Task Force for Assessing the Scientific Output of the Third World. Final Report of the Philadelphia Workshop and of the Discussions Preceeding and Following that Workshop, July 1985.
M. MORAVCSIK, 1985b. Applied scientometrics: An assessment methodology for developing countries,Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 165–175.
M. MORAVCSIK, P. MURUGESAN, E. SHEARER, 1976. An analysis of citation patterns in Indian physics,Science and Culture, 42, 295–301.
D. de Solla PRICE, 1981. The analysis of scientometric matrices for policy implications,Scientometrics, 3, 47–54.
J. M. RUSSELL, M. S. CORREA NOYOLA, N. GARCIA AGUILAR, L. PRIEGO OROZCO, 1987. Research and publications trends of a Latin American university,Interciencia, 12(5), 243–244.
L. VELHO, 1986. The ‘Meaning’ of citation in the context of a scientifically peripheral country,Scientometrics, 9(1–2), 71–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, C.H., Eisemon, T.O. Mainstream and non mainstream scientific literature in four peripheral Asian scientific communities. Scientometrics 15, 215–239 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017200
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017200