Abstract
Over the last decade, ex post research assessment at the program level in the United States has seemed much less active than the equivalent activities in Europe, both west and east. This seeming lull was the result of a decline in program evaluation activity across the U.S. government in the 1980s, which slowed the rate of formal evaluations. Program review activities within agencies, however, were common, especially at such mission-oriented research supporting organizations as the Department of Energy and the Office of Naval Research. Review processes at these agencies relied primarily on expert assessment, sometimes at the project level, supplemented by user inputs. Quantitative performance measures were seldom used. That situation is about to change. In 1993, Congress passed the Government Performance and Results Act, which requires all agencies including those support research to set quantitative performance targets and report annually on their progress toward them. Agencies with clear technological goals are rapidly developing sets of indicators for this use, including peer assessments, bibliometric measures including patents, and customer satisfaction ratings. But fundamental research agencies do not find such measures satisfactory, and are just beginning to develop alternative ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This document represents the views of the author alone and not necessarily those of the National Science Foundation. The author is on leave from the Department of Science and Technology Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cozzens, S. U. S. Research assessment: Recent developments. Scientometrics 34, 351–362 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018004
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018004