Skip to main content
Log in

The growth of biophysical literature

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The enormous growth of biophysical literature has created great difficulties in tracking out the significant literature of the subject. To cope with this unprecedented growth of literature, a new bibliometric technique has been applied to rank periodicals in the field based on 4228 citation data collected from the bibliographic data base published in the source journal namely,Annual Review of Biophysics. This list is expected to reflect the impact of literature on the advancement of knowledge in the field of biophysics. A striking feature of the ranking list is the high positions occupied by multidisciplinary science journals and biochemical journals as compared to journals exclusively and specifically devoted to biophysics or any particular aspects of it. Other remarkable findings are the wide scatter of biophysics literature; dominance of the USA journals and status attained by English as the preferred medium of communications of the working biophysicists. The data are also analysed according to subject categorization of the ranked periodicals. The results of the present study have been discussed in relation to Bradford's Law of Scattering and validity of the extension of the law, suggested earlier, has been well established. It is expected that the present ranking list will enable the working biophysicists to select journals from the viewpoint of their significance to the active areas of present-day biophysical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. N. SENGUPTA,International Library Review, 11 (1972) 169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. L. K. GROSS, E. M. GROSS,Science, N. Y., 66 (1927) 385.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. H. BROWN,ACRL Monographs No. 16 Chicago, 1963, p. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. C. BRADFORD,Documentation, Public Affairs Press, Washington, D. C., 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. N. SENGUPTA,Nature, London, 244 (1973) 75, 118.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. D. WATSON F. H. C. CRICK,Nature, London, 171 (1953) 737.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. C. KENDREW,Scientific American, 205 (1961) 96.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. F. PERUTZ,Scientific American, 211 (1964) 64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sengupta, I.N. The growth of biophysical literature. Scientometrics 8, 365–375 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018059

Keywords

Navigation