Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

World science in 18 disciplinary areas: Comparative evaluation of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981–1992

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to be able to develop indicators that can measure the scientific and technological productivity of a nation, it is helpful to have at one's command a prior purely descriptive global overview of how various nations stand with respect to each other with regard to world science, i.e., to dispose of a framework for the elaboration of future quantitative studies.

ISI has recently made available a highly comprehensive multidisciplinary database (over 6 million bibliometric entries from 1981 to 1992) that is founded on top-echelon journals and that can form the basis of such a framework. We have in the present study defined a publication pattern per nation that reflects its interest and potential in 18 disciplines and compared the publication patterns of 48 nations by descriptive multivariate analysis, i.e., by measuring the distance between nations in the n-dimensional system. Proximity is a sign of similarity, distance of diversity. Three multivariate methods of distance measurement were used: a hierarchical classification, the distance of each nation from the centre of gravity of the system calculated by χ2-metrics (typicality of behaviour), a bi-plot of the χ2-distances of 46 countries with respect to two reference countries that highlights clusters of nations with similar behaviour.

The resultant plots are open to interpretation by experts. We conclude that three factors, geographical proximity, culture, and economic development are the principal determinants of the publication patterns of nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. C. Engelsman, A. F. J. van Raan, A patent-based cartography of technology,Research Policy, 23 (1994) 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. F. Miquel, J. C. Doré, L'industrie pharmaceutique et la recherche de nouveaux médicaments,Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 18 (1981) 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Narin, E. Noma, R. Perry, Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength,Research Policy, 22 (1993) 108–110.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. F. Moed, W. J. M. Burger, J. G. Frankfort, A. F. van Raan,On the Measurement of Research Performance: The Use of Bibliometric Indicators, Center for Science and Technology Studies, University of Leiden, Leiden, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun, Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 16 (1989) 3–478.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Garfield, Citation indexing for studying science,Nature, 227 (1970) 669–671.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Garfield,Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Chubin, Knowledge and structures of scientific growth: measurement of a cancer problem domain,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 171–193.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. C. Doré, M. Boilod-Bouquet, G. Gordon, J. F. Miquel, L'Analyse des aspects essentiels de 35 années d'innovation pharmaceutique,CPA Management, 3 (1983) 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Braun, I. Gomez, A. Mendez, A. Schubert, International co-authorship patterns in physics and its subfields 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 24 (1992) 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. R. Martin, J. Irvine, Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy,Research Policy, 12 (1983) 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. P. F. Peters, A. F. J. van Raan, On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45 (1994) 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Small, Co-citation in the scientific literature. A new measure of the relationship between publications,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973) 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Small, E. Sweeney, Clustering the science citation index using cocitations: A comparison of methods,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Callon, J. P. Courtial, W. A. Turner, S. Bouin, From translation to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis,Social Science Information, 22 (1983) 191–235.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Callon, J. Law, A. Rip (Eds),Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Macmillan Press, London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. F. Miquel, Y. Okubo, Structure of international collaboration in science: Part II: Comparisons of profiles in countries using a LINK indicator,Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 271–297.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Okubo, J. F. Miquel, L. Frigoletto, J. C. Doré, Structure of international collaboration in science: Typology of countries through multivariate techniques using a LINK indicator,Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 321–351.

    Google Scholar 

  19. National Science Board,Science and Engineering Indicators, Washington D. C., 1987.

  20. D. P. Hamilton, Publishing by- and for?-the numbers (News and Comment),Science, 250 (1990) 1331–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Pendlebury, Research papers: Who's uncited now?Science, 251 (1991) 25.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Cole, N.B. Eales, The history of comparative anatomy—A statistical analysis of the literature,Science Progress, 11 (44) (1917) 578–596.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Price, Measuring the size of science,Proceedings of the Israel Academy of Science and Humanities, 4 (1969) 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Hoyningen-Huene,Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science, University of Chicago Press, 1993.

  25. C. Chatfield, A. J. Collins,Introduction to Multivariate Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Jambu,Exploratory and Multivariate Data Analysis, Academic Press, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. N. Lance, W. T. Williams, Computer programs for hierarchical polythetic classification (“similarity analyses”),Computer Journal, 9 (1966) 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. Lebart, A. Morineau, K. M. Warwick,Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis, Wiley, Chichester UK, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. F. Miquel, The changing patterns of international collaboration in universities, In:D. S. Zinberg (Ed.),The Changing University, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1991, pp. 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  30. T. Ojasoo, J. C. Doré, J. P. Mornon, J. P. Raynaud, Two approaches to structure-activity relationships in the field of sex-steroids and their analogs, In:M. Bohl, W. L. Duax (Eds),Molecular Structure and Biological Activity of Steroids, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1992, pp. 157–207.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Anderson, P. M. D. Collins, J. Irvine, P. A. Isard, B. R. Martin, F. Narin, K. Stevens, On-line approaches to measuring national scientific output: A cautionary tale,Science and Public Policy, 15 (1989) 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Chubin, Noneconomic Quantitative Measures: The “Output” of Science, In:Research Funding as an Investment: Can we Measure the Returns? Office of Technology Assessment, Washington D.C., 1986, pp. 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Leydesdorff, Problems with the ‘measurement’ of national scientific performance,Science and Public Policy, 15 (1988) 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. David, Le français et l'anglais: Réalités sociologiques et impératifs politiques,La Recherche, 8 (1977) 192.

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Leclerc, Y. Okubo, L. Frigoletto, J. F. Miquel, The scientific co-operation between Canada and the European Community,Science and Public Policy, 19 (1992) 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. Ueda, Y. Dewa, K. Kurata, The Japanese scientific and technical journal coverage of 9 databases. A survey,Journal of the Japanese Documentation Society, 33 (1983) 421–430.

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Ernst, T. Kiefenbacher, Chauvinism,Nature, 352 (1991) 560.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Carpenter, F. Narin, The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 430–439.

    Google Scholar 

  39. E. Garfield, How do we select journals for Current Contents?Current Contents, Nov. 5 (1979).

  40. B. R. Martin, The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance. A reply to Braun, Glänzel and Schubert,Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 333–357.

    Google Scholar 

  41. T. Ojasoo, J. C. Doré, J. F. Miquel, Regional cinderellas,Nature, 370 (1994) 172.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Stratégie et Technologie, CNRS, Ecole Centrale Paris, 92295, Châtenay-Malabry, (France)

    J. F. Miquel, Y. Okubo & A. Paul

  2. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75252, Paris Cedex 05, (France)

    T. Ojasoo

  3. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS URA 401, 75231, Paris Cedex 05, (France)

    J. C. Doré

Authors
  1. J. F. Miquel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Ojasoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Okubo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. C. Doré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miquel, J.F., Ojasoo, T., Okubo, Y. et al. World science in 18 disciplinary areas: Comparative evaluation of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981–1992. Scientometrics 33, 149–167 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020566

Keywords

Search

Navigation