Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Life in a multidimensional world

  • Special Report
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The methodology of the science of science is claimed to be plagued by one-dimensional thinking, and it is urged that a multi-dimensional view be adopted instead. In a one-dimensional model “cause” is a meaningful word, superlatives can be used, dichotomous thinking is realistic, with a resultant “zero-sum” mentality, and the “make a hypothesis-find a correlation” method makes sense. In the multidimensional framework these four characteristics are unsuitable, and instead a quite different set of questions arise as appropriate. This is illustrated on five examples taken from among currently interesting questions in the science of science. Following some remarks about simplicity and about the role and limitations of multiple regression analyses, it is concluded that, among other things, more purely phenomenological studies are needed to make progress in the science of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. P. K. FEYERABEND, How to be a Good Empiricist. A Plea for Tolerance in Epistemalogical Matters, in: P. N. NIDDITCH (Ed.),The Philosophy of Science, University Press, Ely House, London, Oxford 1968, pp. 12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an example of this point of view, see D. de SOLLA PRICE, The Science/Technology Relationship, the Craft of Experimental Science, and Policy for the Improvement of High Technology Innovation, Final Report for the Division for Policy Research Analysis, National Science Foundation, March 1982.

  3. This point of view is quite rampant in the community of the sociologists of science. See for example R. K. MERTON,The Sociology of Science, The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Press, Chicago, 1972, p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The main proponent of this view has been D. de SOLLA PRICE. See for example D. de SOLLA PRICEJasis 27 (1976) 292.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a fairly recent bibliography, see J. VLACHY,Scientometrics 1 (1976) 109.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A good example of this point of view can be found in P. FORMAN,Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918–1937: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences III, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1971, pp. 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  7. An interesting series of exchanges, some of which reflects this point of view, appeared inInterciencia 6 (1981), 3 167.

  8. G. N. GILBERT, M. MULKAY,Soc. Stud. of Science, 12 (1982) 383.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Theoretical Science University of Oregon, 97403, Eugene, Oregon, (USA)

    M. J. Moravcsik

Authors
  1. M. J. Moravcsik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moravcsik, M.J. Life in a multidimensional world. Scientometrics 6, 75–85 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021280

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021280

Keywords