Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of influence weights for scientific journals

An example from elementary particle physics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new citation matrix is proposed for the computation of journal influence weights applying Geller's methodology. Instead of self-citations, references to fringe journals are introduced and the proportions of all references (without self-citations) are used as matrix elements. On the basis of the determined weights, relative weights for fringe journals are calculated, i.e. the initial set (core) of journals is extended and simultaneously a rank order is obtained (by total influence and influence per article). The procedure is examplified on elementary particle physics (EPP) journals. Using first a reference/citation criterion, eight core journals were determined by iteration and then influence weights were calculated. A ranking by total influence and influence per article is presented for core and fringe journals in EPP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. GARFIELD, Introducing Journal Citation Reports,Current Contents, (1976) No. 35, 5–20. Reprinted in: E. GARFIELD,Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 2, Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1977, 556–571.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. SINGLETON, Journal Ranking and Selection: A Review in Physics,J. of Docum., 32 (1976) No. 4, 258–289.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. GARFIELD, Is citation Analysis a Legitimate Evaluation Tool?,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) No. 4, 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. CRONIN, The Need for a Theory of Citing,J. of Docum., 37 (1981) No 1, 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. C. SMITH, Citation Analysis,Libr. Trends, 30 (1981) 1, 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. E. CAWKELL, Evaluating Scientific Journals with Journal Citation Reports — A Case Study in Acoustics,J. of the ASIS, 29 (1978) 1, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. HIRST, Discipline Impact Factors: A Method for Determining Core Journal Lists,J. of the ASIS, 29 (1978) No. 4, 171–172.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. N. SERVI, C. G. GRIFFITH, A Method for Partitioning the Journal Literature,J. of the ASIS, 31 (1980) 1, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. PINSKI, F. NARIN, Citation Influence for Journal Aggregates of Scientific Publications: Theory, with Application to the Literature of Physics,Inf. Proc. and Man., 12 (1976) No. 5, 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. L. GELLER, Citation Influence Methodology of Pinski and Narin,Inf. Proc. and Man., 14 (1978) No. 2, 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. I. YANOVSKY, Citation Analysis Significance of Scientific Journals,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) No. 3, 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. R. McALLISTER, R. C. ANDERSON, F. NARIN, Comparison of Peer and Citation Assessment of the Influence of Scientific Journals,J. of the ASIS, 31 (1980) No. 3, 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. D. GORDON, Citation Ranking versus Subjective Evaluation in the Determination of Journal Hierarchies in the Social Sciences,J. of the ASIS, 33 (1982) No. 1, 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. C. SMART, C. F. ELTON, Consumption Factor Scores of Psychology Journals: Scientometric Properties and Qualitative Implications,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) No 5, 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. GARFIELD, What Scientific Journals Can Tell Us about Scientific Journals,IEEE Tr. Prof. Comm., PC-16 (1973) No. 4, 200–202.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. GARFIELD, Citation Analysis of Scientific Journals, Ch. 9 in: E. GARFIELD,Citation Indexing, John Wiley N. Y. 1979, 148–234.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. M. RAISIG, Mathematical Evaluation of the Scientific Serial,Science, 131 (1960) No. 3411, 1417–1419.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. TODOROV, Condensed Matter Physics Journals,Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. de S. PRICE, The Analysis of Square Matrices of Scientometric Transactions,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) No. 1, 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. NOMA, An Improved Method for Analyzing Square Scientometric Transaction Matrices,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 4, 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. TODOROV, Untersuchungen zur Informationsverbreitung auf dem Gebiet der Physik, Diss., Berlin: Humboldt Univ., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  22. VLACHY J., Publication Output in Physics Subfields,Czech. J. Phys, B. 29 (1979) No. 7, 829–836.

    Google Scholar 

  23. VLACHY J., World Publication Output in Particle Physics,Czech. J. Phys., B 32 (1982 No. 9, 1065–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  24. VLACHY J., Citation Analysis in Particle Physics,Czech. J. Phys., B 32 (1982) No. 10, 1187–1194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Todorov, R. Determination of influence weights for scientific journals. Scientometrics 6, 127–137 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021288

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021288

Keywords