Skip to main content
Log in

Consensus reaching via a GDSS with fuzzy majority and clustering of preference profiles

  • Section III Group Decision And Consensus Reaching Support
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An interactive DSS for consensus reaching is presented. Experts provide their testimonies as fuzzy preference relations. The consensus reaching process is supervised by a moderator (“super-expert”). A degree of consensus, based on the concept of a fuzzy majority given as a linguistic quantifier is employed. Algorithms of cluster analysis are used to find groups of experts having similar preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.C. Bezdek, B. Spillman and R. Spillman, A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1(1978)255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.C. Bezdek, B. Spillman and R. Spillman, Fuzzy relation spaces for group decision theory: an application, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2(1979)5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. DeSanctis and R.B. Gallupe, Group decision support systems: a new frontier, Data Base(1985)3–10.

  4. G. DeSanctis and R.B. Gallupe, A foundation for the study of group decision support systems, Manag. Sci. 33(1987)589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Fedrizzi and J. Kacprzyk, On measuring consensus in the setting of fuzzy preference relations, in: ref [22] (1988) pp. 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Fedrizzi, J. Kacprzyk and S. Zadrozny, An interactive multi-user decision support system for consensus reaching processes using fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers, Dec. Support Syst. 4(1989)313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Gray, Group decision support systems, Dec. Support Syst. 3(1987)233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G.P. Huber, Issues in the design of the group decision support systems, MIS Quarterly 8(1984)195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Kacprzyk, Collective decision making with a fuzzy majority rule,Proc. WOGSC Congress, AFCET, Paris (1984) pp. 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Kacprzyk, Group decision-making with a fuzzy majority via linguistic quantifiers. Part I: A consensory-like pooling; Part II: A competitive-like pooling, Cybern. Syst. Int. J. 16(1985)119–129 (Part I), 131–144 (Part II).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Kacprzyk, Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 18(1986)105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Kacprzyk, On some fuzzy cores and “soft” consensus measures in group decision making, in:The Analysis of Fuzzy Information, ed. J.C. Bezdek Vol. 2 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1987) pp. 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Kacprzyk, Towards “human consistent” decision support systems thrugh commonsense-knowledge-based decision making and control models: a fuzzy logic approach, Comp. Art. Int. 6(1987)97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi, “Soft” consensus measures for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences, Contr. Cybern. 15(1986)309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi, A “soft” measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 34(1988)316–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi, A “human-consistent” degree of consensus based on fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers, Math. Social Sci. 18(1989)275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi,Multiperson Decision Making Models Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi and H. Nurmi, Group decision making with fuzzy majorities represented by linguistic quantifiers, in:Approximate Reasoning Tools for Artificial Intelligence, ed. J.L. Verdegay and M. Delgado (Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Cologne, 1990) pp. 126–145.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi and H. Nurmi, Fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers in group decision making and consensus formation, in:An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems, ed. R.R. Yager and L.A. Zadeh (Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1992) pp. 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Kacprzyk and H. Nurmi, Linguistic quantifiers and fuzzy majorities for more realistic and human-consistent group decision making, in:Fuzzy Methodologies for Industrial and Systems Engineering, ed. G. Evans, W. Karwowski and M. Wilhelm (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989) pp. 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Kacprzyk and H. Nurmi, On fuzzy tournaments and their solution concepts in group decision making, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 51(1991)223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Kacprzyk and M. Roubens (eds.),Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Loewer (Guest Ed.), Special Issue on Consensus, Synthese 62(1)(1985).

  24. H. Nurmi, Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 6(1985)187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Nurmi,Comparing Voting Systems (Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Nurmi, Assumptions on individual preferences in the theory of voting procedures, in: ref. [22] (1988) pp. 142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Nurmi, M. Fedrizzi and J. Kacprzyk, Vague notions in the theory of voting, in: ref. [17], (1990) pp. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.W. Owsiński, On a new naturally indexed quick clustering method with a global objective function, Appl. Stoch. Models Data Anal. 6(1990)157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.W. Owsiński and S. Zadrożny, Preference aggregation and ordinal grouping: the use of explicit objective functions, Wirtsch. Zeits. TH Leipzig 12(3)(1988)177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.W. Owsiński and S. Zadrożny, The problem of clusterwise aggregation of preferences, in:Decision Making Models for Management and Manufacturing, ed. R. Kulikowski and J. Stefański (Omnitech Press, Warsaw, 1990) pp. 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  31. B. Spillman, J.C. Bezdek and R. Spillman, Coalition analysis with fuzzy sets, Kybernetes 8(1979)203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  32. B. Spillman, R. Spillman and J.C. Bezdek, A fuzzy analysis of consensus in small groups, in:Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications to Policy Analysis and Information Systems, ed. P.P. Wang and S.K. Chang (Plenum, New York, 1980) pp. 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  33. L.A. Zadeh, A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages, Comp. Math. Appl. 9(1983)149–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Zadrożny and P. Furlani, Modelling and supporting of the consensus reaching process using fuzzy preference relations, Contr. Cybern. 20(1991)135–154.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R.R. Yager, Quantifiers in the formulation of multiple objective decision functions, Infor. Sci. 31(1983)107–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fedrizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J., Owsiński, J.W. et al. Consensus reaching via a GDSS with fuzzy majority and clustering of preference profiles. Ann Oper Res 51, 127–139 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032481

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032481

Keywords

Navigation