Skip to main content
Log in

Alternatives for reliable and quality telecommunication network design

  • Section II Network Reliability
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today's highly competitive telecommunication market, customers expect and demand reliable and high-quality service. In order to please customers, new telecommunication systems and networks which support a wide range of voice, data and video services are being designed with extremely high reliability/availability requirements, but usually without much consideration of cost. These super-reliable systems are generally very complex and therefore extremely expensive to develop, build, and operate. Increased costs are going to be reflected in the price of the services the system is offering, and the reliability benefits may be overshadowed by the fact that the procurement and operations of the system may be too costly; customers will be drawn to competitors with less expensive network solutions and more affordable services. This paper discusses alternative approaches to the system design from the point of view of future costs. We will illustrate that the system can be improved not only by increasing reliability of subsystems, but also by effectively utilizing system operations support. The operations support alternatives may be less expensive than reliability improvements and, in addition, may provide many strategic marketing advantages. In the telecommunication industry, a high-quality service requirement usually translates into a high-quality network. Network support is defined, and customers' expectations are discussed. In an example, based on the concept of distributed switching systems, we show how the selection of the maintenance/repair operation policy may influence the cost of the system operations and reduce the hardware costs involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.R. Doll, Where to spend money to improve system availability, Data Commun. 3 (4) (1974)152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Fried and P. Kubat, Reliability models for facility switching, IEEE Trans. Reliability 39(1990)301–308.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.J. Harrington, The productivity and quality connection, IEEE J. Selected Areas in Commun. SAC-4(1986)1009–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.G. Hedge and P. Kubat, Diagnostics design: A product support strategy, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 38(1989)35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Huslende, Optimal cost/reliability allocation in communication networks,FTCS 13th Annual Int. Symp. on Fault-Tolerant Computing, Milano, Italy (1983).

  6. U.S. Karmarkar and P. Kubat, Modular replacement in product support, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 29(1987)74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Kubat, Network support: Formulation and Optimization, Technical Memorandum TN 85-262.8, GTE Laboratories, Waltham, MA (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Kubat, Reliability analysis for integrated networks with application to burst switching, IEEE Trans. on Commun. COM-34(1986)564–568.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.M. Lele, How to protect your unguarded battlefield, Business Marketing (June, 1983).

  10. M.M. Lele and U.S. Karmarkar, Good product support is smart marketing, Harvard Business Rec. 61 (6) (1983)124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Luss and S. Gupta, Allocation of effort resources among competing activities, Oper. Res. 5(1975)360–366.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.M. Ross,Stochastic Processes (Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.V.V. Vidal, A graphical method to solve a family of allocation problems, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 17(1984)31–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kubat, P. Alternatives for reliable and quality telecommunication network design. Ann Oper Res 33, 95–105 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02073594

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02073594

Keywords

Navigation