Skip to main content
Log in

Between policy categories and research activities: Reviews and journals to describe “environment” networks

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a scientometric procedure which assists in the production of bibliometric indicators for conducting international comparisons about transdisciplinary research field. The procedure aims at the analysis of how a nomenclature in the field of the environment, established by public research administrators, translates into subsets of scientific journals. Relations between the nomenclature and scientific disciplines were obtained through analysis of reviews. The environmental field's structure has been analysed by using journal cross-citation data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and References

  1. See for instance,Th. N. van Leeuwen andR. J. W. Tussen, Assessing multidisciplinary areas of science and technology: a synthetic bibliometric study of Dutch nuclear energy research,Scientometrics, 26 (1993), 115–133 — for nuclear energy and the Netherlands:L. A. Rogers andJ. Anderson, A new approach to defining a multidisciplinary field of science: the case of cardiovascular biology,Scientometrics, 28 (1993), 61–77 — for vascular cardiology and Great-Britain;I. Gomez, E. Sanz andA. Mendez, Utility of bibliometric analysis for research policy: A case study of Spanish research in neuroscience,Research Policy, 19 (1990), 457–466 — for neurosciences and Spain.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Nederhof, Changes in publication patterns of biotechnologists: an evaluation of the impact of government stimulation programs in six industrial nations,Scientometrics, 14 (1988), 475–485;D. Crouch, J. Irvine andB. R. Martin, Bibliometric analysis for science policy: an evaluation of the United Kingdom's research performance in ocean currents and protein crystallography,Scientometrics, 9 (1986), 239–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Rip, Mapping of science: possibilities and limitations, In:Handbook of quantative studies of science and technology A. F. J. Van Raan (Ed.), North-Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 1988, 253–273;F. Bastide, J.-P. Courtial andM. Callon, The use of review articles in the analysis of research area,Scientometrics, 15 (1989), 535–562.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Narin, M. Carpenter andN. C. Berlt, Interrelationships of scientific journals,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27 (1972), 25–45;L. Leydesdorff, S. E. Cozzens andP. van den Besselaar, Tracking areas of strategic importance using scientometric journal mappings,Research Policy, 23 (1994), 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sigogneau, A. Between policy categories and research activities: Reviews and journals to describe “environment” networks. Scientometrics 37, 337–348 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093628

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093628

Keywords

Navigation