Skip to main content
Log in

Methods and results of studying the flow of information in the field of thin-film superconductivity

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with a physical-statistical analysis on the information flows in the field of superconductive thin films for 1949 to 1977. The classification of scientific research is done and an attempt is made to determine the correlations between the different types. The dynamics of growth of the number of publications is considered, and changes of researchers' scientific interests concerning the application of various chemical materials and structures in superconductive thin films are studied. The problems of professional mobility are also investigated. Conclusions are drawn on the development of the described field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and Refernces

  1. A. G. ALEKSEYEV, V. G. VARTANOV, A. A. VASILKOVSKY, G. M. DOBROV, I. V. DZIEKOVSKAYA, H. M. ZAIDBERG,Facet Classification in Physics and Engineering of Thin Films. Institute of Cybernatics, Academy of Sciences, Ukr SSR, Kiev, 1977, 46 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. M. GVISHIANI, Social Role of Science and State Policy in the Field of Science. — in:Management, Planning and Organization of Scientific and Theoretical Research Studies. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Countries-Members of CEMA and SERYu, v. 1. Moscow, VINITI, 1970, pp. 21–77.

  3. G. M. DOBROV, B. N. KLIMENYUK, G. A. SAMOILOV et al.Science Management. Kiev, Naukova Dumka, 1971, 268 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. VALENTINOVICH Theoretical Aspects of Science Study, in:Management, Planning and Organization of Scientific and Theoretical Research Studies. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Countries-Members of CEMA and SFRYu, v. 2. Moscow, VINITI 1971, pp. 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. KEDROV On Forms of Science and Engineering Cooperation, in:Management, Planning and Organization of Scientific and Theoretical Research Studies. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Countries-Members of CEMA and SFRYu, v. 2. Moscow, VINITI, 1971, pp. 42–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. AUGER,Modern Tendencies in Scientific Research. UNESCO, Paris, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. ZAKHARIEV, Role of Fundamental Scientific Research in the Development of the PRB National Economy. in:Management, Planning and Organization of Scientific and Theoretical Research Studies. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Countries-Members of CEMA and SFRYu, v. 2. Moscow, VINIT, 1971, pp. 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. REDULETZ, To the Question of the Scientific Research Classification, in:Management, planning and Organization of Scientific and Technical Research Studies. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Countries-Members of CEMA and SFRYu, v. 2. Moscow, VINITI, 1971, pp. 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. A. SAMOILOV,Scientific Organization of Work in an Institute. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1968, 40 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. BOAS, Alapkutatás és alkalmazott kutatás.Fiz. Szemle, 1971, 21, No. 4, p. 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. U. AYRES,Technological Forecasting and Long-Range Planning, New York, St. Louis-San Francisco-London-Sydney, McGraw-hill Book Company, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. W. BREMER, Joint AIEE-IRE-NYU Conference on Cryogenic Electronics, New York, Dec. 9, 1957.

  13. J. W. CROWE, Conference on Low Temperature, Madison, 1957, p. 238.

  14. E. C. CRITTENDEN, J. N. COOPER, F. W. SCHMIDLIN—Proc. IRE, 48, 1960, 1233.

  15. M. J. BUCKINGHAM, Conference on Low Temperature, Madison, 1957; p. 229.

  16. J. W. BREMER,Superconductive Devices. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York-Toronto-London, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. U. AYRES et al.,Hypercryogenics, Science for Business, Inc., Published by Plenum Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  18. UNESCO.Science Policy and the European States. Paris, 1971, p. 94.

  19. D. de S. PRICE, J. BEAVER, Collaboration in an Invisible College. —American Psychologist, 21 1966, 1011–18.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Profiles of Philosophy Doctors in the Sciences, Washington, 1965, p. 50. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council publication No. 1293.

  21. D. G. BROWN,The Mobile Professors, W. 1967, p. 37.

  22. M. I. MORAVCSIK, Reflections on National Laboratories,Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1970, February, p. 29.

  23. H. E. FRITZ, Relocating a Major Laboratory. —Research Management, (1968) No. 3, 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. KOOGEL, Structure and Dynamics of Scientific Personnel, in:Management, Planning and Organization of Scientific and Theoretical Research Studies, Proceedings of the International Symposium of Countries-Members of CEMA and SFRYu, v. 2. Noscow, VINITI, 1971, pp. 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dobrov, G.M., Dziekovskaya, I.V. Methods and results of studying the flow of information in the field of thin-film superconductivity. Scientometrics 4, 27–44 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098004

Keywords

Navigation