Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Editorial gatekeeping patterns in international science journals. A new science indicator

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Significant correlations were found between the number of science journal editors from different countries, on the one hand, and the number of scientists, the number of science journals and the number of science papers produced by these countries on the other. We argue for using the extent of participation in the editorial board of international science journals as a new science indicator. The deviations from the regression lines between the new indicator and other publication indicators allow one to assess the “open” or “closed” character of the scientific life of a given country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. D. de SOLLA PRICE,Little Science, Big Science, Columbia Univ. Press, 1963

  2. F. NARIN,Evaluative Bibliometrics. The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity, Computer Horisons Inc. Report No. 704 R, Washington D. C., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Science Board,Science Indicators 1978, Washington D. C. Government Printing Office, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. NALIMOV, Z. M. MULCHENKO,Naukometriya, Nauka, Moscow, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. NARIN, M. P. CARPENTER: National Publication and Citation Comparisons,J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 26 (1975) 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. J. MEADOWS (Ed.),The Scientific Journal, London, Aslib, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. D. FRAME, Measuring Scientific Activity in Lesser Developed Countries,Scientometrics, 2 (1978) 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. D. GORDON: Disciplinary Differences, Editorial Practices and the Scattering of Rejection Rates for UK Research Journals,J. Res. Commun. Stud. 1 (1978) 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. LINDSEY, T. LINDSEY, The Outlook of Journal Editors and Referens on the Normative Criteria of Scientific Craftmanship,Quality and Quantity, 12 (1978) 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. COLE, S. COLE, Scientific Output and Recognition. A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science,Amer. Sociolog. Rev., 32 (1967) 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. D. GARVEY,Communication: the Essence of Science, Pergamon, Oxford, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. CRANE: The Gatekeepers of Science: Some Factors Affecting the Selection of Articles of Scientific Journals,Amer. Sociologist, 2 (1967) 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. P. CARPENTER, F. NARIN: The Subject Composition of the World's Scientific Journals,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Who is Publishing in Science (WIPIS), 1978, Philadelphia, Institute for Scientific Information, 1979.

  15. J. D. FRAME, M. P. CARPENTER: International Research Collaboration,Soc. Stud. Sci., 9 (1979) 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. INHABER: Where Scientists PublishSoc. Stud. Sci., 7 (1977) 388–394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zsindely, S., Schubert, A. & Braun, T. Editorial gatekeeping patterns in international science journals. A new science indicator. Scientometrics 4, 57–68 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098006

Keywords