Skip to main content
Log in

Cell versus message level performances in ATM networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to provide some insight into the relations that exist between cell level and message level performance guarantees in the context of ATM networks. Cell level guarantees are typically what the network is capable of providing, while message level guarantees are the ones of interest to users. It is, therefore, important to understand how the two are related, and which factors influence this relation. There are many different performance measures that are of importance, and in this paper we try to touch on the (three) most relevant ones. This includes comparing cell and message loss probabilities, average cell and message delays, and cell and message jitter. Specifically, we show that cell and message loss probabilities can exhibit significant differences, which strongly depend on traffic characteristics such as peak rate and burst size, i.e., for a fixed cell loss probability, the message loss probability can greatly vary when peak rate and burst size change. One reason for this sensitivity, is that message loss depends on what happen toall the cells in a message. For delay and jitter, we also find that peak rate and burst size play a role in determining the relation between cell and message performance. However, this sensitivity is not as acute as with losses since message delay and jitter are typically determined by the performance seen by onlyone cell, the last cell in a message. In the paper, we provide quantitative examples that illustrate the range of behaviors and identify the impact of different parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Gopal and R. Guérin, Network transparency: The plaNET approach, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 2(3) (1994). (See alsoProc. INFOCOM'92.)

  2. M. Naghshineh and R. Guérin, Fixed versus variable packet sizes in fast packet-switched networks,Proc. INFOCOM'93, San Francisco, CA (1993) pp. 217–226.

  3. K.-I. Baba, M. Murata and H. Miyahara, Evaluation of end-to-end performance for data traffic in ATM networks, Electronics and Commun. in Japan (Part I) 76(8)(1994)383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. S.-C. Chen and R. Guérin, On issues related to real-time applications support in the ORBIT Gigabit/sec ring,Proc. 1994 Conf. Broadband Communications, Paris, France (1994).

  5. H. Yamashita and R. O. Onvural, On the cell loss distribution of protocol data units in ATM networks. IFIP Trans. C. Commun. Syst. C-21(1994)183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Y.S. Lin and J. C. Lu, Estimating packet (L3-PDU) loss probabilities from cell (L2-PDU) loss probabilities for networks supporting the SMDS service, IFIP Trans. C. Commun. Syst. C-21(1994)163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Cidon, A. Khamisy and M. Sidi, Analysis of packet loss processes in high speed networks, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 39(1) (1993).

  8. I. Cidon, A. Khamisy and M. Sidi, On queueing delays of dispersed messages, Queueing Systems 15(1994)325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Cidon, A. Khamisy and M. Sidi, Dispersed messages in discrete-time queues: Delay, jitter and threshold crossing,Proc. INFOCOM'94, Toronto, Canada (1994) pp. 218–222.

  10. N. Shacham and P. McKenney, Packet recovery in high-speed networks using coding and buffer management,Proc. INFOCOM'90, San Francisco, CA (1990) pp. 124–131.

  11. L. Gün and R. Guérin, Bandwidth management and congestion control framework of the broadband network architecture, Comp. Networks and ISDN Syst. 26(1)(1993)61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Cidon, R. Guérin and A. Khamisy, An investigation of application level performance in ATM networks, IBM Research Report (1994). (SeeProc. INFOCOM'95 for an abbreviated version.)

  13. A. K. Parekh and R. G. Gallager, A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks: The multiple node case, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 2(2) (1994)137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Georgiadis, R. Guérin, V. Peris and K. Sivarajan, Efficient network QoS provisioning based on per node traffic shaping, IBM Research Report, No. RC 20064 (1995).

  15. A. B. Bondi and W-S. Lai, The influence of cell loss patterns and overheads on retransmission choices in broadband ISDN, Comp. Networks ISDN Syst. 26(5)(1994)585–598.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Guérin, H. Ahmadi and M. Naghshineh, Equivalent capacity and its application to bandwidth allocation in high-speed networks, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. SAC-9(7)(1991)968–981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was done while at the IBM T.J. Watson Research Center.

Part of the work was done while visiting the IBM T.J. Watson Research Center.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cidon, I., Guérin, R., Khamisy, A. et al. Cell versus message level performances in ATM networks. Telecommunication Systems 5, 223–239 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109735

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109735

Keywords

Navigation