Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced load approximations for loss networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a general scheme with which to view reduced load approximations in loss networks. We use notation motivated by stochastic Petri net (SPN) representations of such models and a technique similar to that described by Ciardo and Trivedi for general SPNs. Previous reduced load approximations have involved link independence assumptions. In our method, we assume independence between sets of links rather than between themselves. Our independence assumptions are thus less drastic than those that have been made previously and better results can be expected. Several examples are given in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.Y. Burman, J.P. Lehoczky and Y. Lim, Insensitivity of blocking probabilities in a circuit switching network, J. Appl. Prob. 21(1984)850–859.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.P. Buzen, Computational algorithm for closed networks with exponential servers, Comm. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 16(1973)527–531.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Chiola, A software package for the analysis of generalised stochastic Petri net models,Proc. Int. Workshop on Timed Petri Nets (IEEE-CS Press, Torino, Italy, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.P. Chung and K.W. Ross, Reduced load approximations for multi-rate loss networks,Proc. ITC Specialists Seminar, New Jersey (1990), 11.5.

  5. G. Ciardo, J. Muppala and K.S. Trivedi, SPNO: Stochastic Petri net package,Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Petri Nets and Performance Models, Kyoto, Japan (1989) pp. 142–151.

  6. G. Ciardo and K.S. Trivedi, Solution of large GSPN models,Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on the Numerical Solution of Markov Chains, Raleigh, North Carolina (1990).

  7. G. Ciardo and K.S. Trivedi, A decomposition approach for stochastic Petri net models,Proc. on Petri Nets and Performance Models, Melbourne (1991) pp. 74–85.

  8. J.L. Coleman, W. Henderson and P.G. Taylor, A convolution algorithm for calculating exact equilibrium distributions in resource allocation problems with moderate user interference, IEEE Trans. Comm. (1992), to appear.

  9. J.L. Coleman, W. Henderson and P.G. Taylor, Algorithms for evaluating the normalising constant in stochastic Petri nets with product form equilibrium distributions, submitted.

  10. Z. Dziong and J.W. Roberts, Conhestion probabilities in a circuit-switched integrated services network, Perform. Eval. 7(1987)267–284.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. D.E. Everitt and N.W. Macfadyen, Analysis of multi-cellular mobile radiotelephone systems with loss, British Telecom Technol. J. 1(1983)37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.J. Gibbens, P.J. Hunt and F.P. Kelly, Bistability in communication networks,Disorder in Physical Systems, ed. G.R. Grimmett and D.J.A. Welsh (Oxford University Press, 1989) pp. 113–127.

  13. A. Girard,Routing and Dimensioning in Circuit-Switched Networks (Addison-Wesley, 1990).

  14. D.P. Heyman, Asymptotic marginal independence in large networks of loss systems, Ann. Oper. Res. 8(1987)57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Hajek and A. Krishna, Bounds on the accuracy of the reduced-load blocking formula in some simple circuit-switched networks,Proc. 1990 BILKNET Int. Conf. on New Trends in Communication, Control and Signal Processing, Ankara, Turkey (1990).

  16. J.M. Holtman, Analysis of dependence effects in telephone trunking networks, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 50(1971)2647–2662.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.S. Kaufman, Blocking in a shared resource enviroment, IEEE Trans. Comm. 29(1981)1474–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.S. Katz, Statistical performance analysis of a switched communications network, ITC 5(1967)566–575.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F.P. Kelly, Blocking probabilities in large circuit switched networks, Adv. Appl. Prob. 18(1986)473–505.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F.P. Kelly, Routing in circuit switched networks: Optimisation, shadow prices and decentralisation, Adv. Appl. Prob. 20(1988)112–144.

    Google Scholar 

  21. F.P. Kelly, Loss networks, Ann. Appl. Prob. 1(1991)319–378.

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Le Gall, About loss probabilities for general routing policies in circuit-switched networks, IEEE Trans. Comm. 37(1989)57–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Mitra, Some results from an asymptotic analysis of a class of simple, circuit-switched networks,Teletraffic Analysis and Computer Performance Evaluation, ed. Tijms, Boxma and Cohen (Elsevier, New York, 1986) pp. 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Mitra and P.J. Weinberger, Probabilistic models of database locking: Solutions, computational algorithms, and asymptotics, J. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 31(1984)855–878.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. Whitte, Blocking when service is required from several facilities simultaneously, AT&T Tech. J. 64(1985)1807–1856.

    Google Scholar 

  26. I.B. Ziedins and F.P. Kelly, Limit theorem for loss networks with diverse routing, Adv. Appl. Prob. 21(1989)804–830.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coyle, A.J., Henderson, W. & Taylor, P.G. Reduced load approximations for loss networks. Telecommunication Systems 2, 21–50 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109849

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109849

Keywords

Navigation