Skip to main content
Log in

Reduction of sample sizes in network sampling models

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops and analyzes some statistical sampling methods suitable in a class of telecommunications applications including network cost calculations. The main objective is to obtain the smallest possible sample from a population in such a way that a prespecified desired level of accuracy of the estimated cost is achieved. The cost is assumed to be a function of a number of variables such as CCS and Message. Principal component analysis is used first to reduce the dimensionality of original variables. On the basis of the first few principal components, a graphical analysis is performed to determine the number of clusters, and then cluster analysis is employed to decompose the population into nine nearly homogeneous groups. We have also studied the performance of two sampling designs. Compared to the simple random sampling without any preliminary analysis, the stratified random sampling method with the proposed preliminary analysis provided a considerable reduction in sample size. In a typical application that we tested, the sample sizes required to guarantee the specified accuracy were 1 692 and 359 for simple random sampling and the proposed stratified random sampling, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.F. Andrews, Plots of high-dimensional data, Biometrics 23(1972)125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Chatfield and A.J. Collins,Introduction to Multivariate Analysis (Chapman and Hall, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W.G. Cochran,Sampling Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Everitt,Cluster Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Gnanadesikan, J.R. Kettenring and J.M. Landwehr, Interpreting and assessing the results of cluster analysis, Bull. Int. Statist. Inst. 47(1977)451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.J. Jessen,Statistical Survey Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Kendall,Multivariate Analysis (Oxford University Press, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Scheaffer, W. Mendenhall and L. Ott,Elementary Survey Sampling (PWS Publ., Boston, MA, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. B.S. Everitt and G. Dunn,Advanced Methods of Data Exploration and Modeling (Heinemann Educational Books, London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Taguri, Optimum stratification and its robustness (III): Robustness of sample sizes in respective strata, Rep. Stat. Appl. Res. JUSE 29(2)(1982)19–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J.J., Weerahandi, S. Reduction of sample sizes in network sampling models. Telecommunication Systems 2, 225–238 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109859

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109859

Keywords

Navigation