Abstract
A new ATM output buffer management strategy with priority control function is proposed, based on four types of cell classes. This strategy can use system resource more effectively, meet the quality of service (QOS) requirements (i.e. cell loss probabilities and delay characteristics) of different services, and also can reduce the complexity of buffer. Furthermore, overload from lower priority traffic doesn't degrade the performance of higher priority traffic (i.e. cell loss rate and cell delay characteristics).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.J. Karol et al., Input versus output queueing on a space-division packet switching, IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-35 (Dec. 1987).
H. Ohmishi et al., Flow control schemes and delay/loss tradeoff in ATM network, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. SAC-6 (9) (1988).
P. Boyer, A congestion control for the ATM,ITC Specialist Seminar, Morristown, 1990.
CCITT SG X VIII, Revised Recommendation I.150: B-ISDN ATM functional characteristics, Geneva (1992).
L. Kleinrock,Queuing System, Vol. 2 (Wiley, 1975).
H. Kroner, Comparative performance study of space priority mechanism for ATM network,Proc. INFOCOM 90, San Francisco.
J. Riordan,Stochastic Service System (Wiley, 1962).
L. Platzman et al., A simple and efficient algorithm to compute tail probabilities from transforms, Oper. Res. 36 (1988).
Y.S. Yeh et al., The knockout switch: a simple, modular architecture for high-performance packet switching,ISS'87, Phoenix, 1987.
M.H. MacDougall,Simulating Computer Systems Techniques and Tools (MIT Press, 1987).
H. Kroner, Buffer access mechanisms for multiplexing of different traffic classes in an ATM network, Doc Race UST-123-008-CD-CC (1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ShanZhi, C., Liemin, Y. A new priority control of ATM output buffer. Telecommunication Systems 4, 61–69 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110078
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110078