Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear control of planar multibody systems in shape space

  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling, reduction, and nonlinear control of planar multibody systems motivated by the classicalcat-fall problem and the practical problem of reorientation of free-floating multibody satellites with rotational joints using angular-momentum-preserving controls is studied. The system model considered is reduced by the first integral (the system angular momentum) resulting in a Hamiltonian system with a configuration space of relative joint angles (shape space). Reconstruction of dynamics is applied to modify the shape-space model and track the phase shift of the absolute angles. An important reachability result is then proved in the unreduced configuration space. Control synthesis can then be found in a feedback form, solving the reorientation problem completely. Surprisingly, the reachability result breaks down in the case of the planar coupled two-body system with zero angular momentum, proving that the cat-fall phenomenon is definitely nonplanar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Abraham and J. E. Marsden,Foundations of Mechanics, 2nd edn., Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Arnold,Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. W. Brockett, Nonlinear systems and differential geometry,Proc. IEEE,64 (1976), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. W. Brockett, Feedback invariants of nonlinear systems,Preprints, 6th IFAC Congress, Helsinki, 1978, pp. 1115–1120.

  5. W. L. Chow, Über systeme von linearen partiellen differentialgleichungen erster Ordnung,Math. Ann.,117 (1939), 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. E. Crouch and A. J. van der Schaft,Variational and Hamiltonian Control Systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 101, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Frolich, Do springboard divers violate angular momentum conservation?Amer. J. Phys.,47 (1979), 583–592.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Grossman, P. S. Krishnaprasad, and J. E. Marsden, Dynamics of two coupled three-dimensional rigid bodies, inDynamical Systems Approaches to Nonlinear Problems in Systems and Circuits (F. M. A. Salam and M. L. Levi, eds.), pp. 373–378, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Isidori,Nonlinear Control Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. R. Kane and M. P. Scher, A dynamical explanation of the falling cat phenomenon,Internat. J. Solids and Structures,5 (1969), 663–670.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. S. Krishnaprasad, Geometric phases and optimal reconfiguration of multibody systems,Proceedings of the 1990 American Control Conference, San Diego, CA, 1990, pp. 2440–2444.

  12. P. S. Krishnaprasad and R. Yang, On the geometry and dynamics of floating four-bar linkages, 1991 (submitted).

  13. M. Kummer, On the construction of the reduced phase space of a Hamiltonian system with symmetry,Indiana Univ. Math. J.,30 (1981), 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Lobry, Controllability of nonlinear systems on compact manifolds,SIAM J. Control Optim.,12 (1974), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. MacDonald, How does a man twist in the air?New Scientist,10 (1961), 501–503.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. E. Marsden, R. Montgomery, and T. Ratiu,Reduction, Symmetry and Phases in Mechanics, American Mathematical Society Memoirs, No. 436, AMS, Providence, RI, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Montgomery, Optimal control of deformable bodies, isoholonomic problems, and sub-Reimannian geometry, MSRI Technical Report 05324-89, Berkeley, CA, June 1989.

  18. Y. Nakamura and R. Mukerjee, Nonholonomic path planning of space robots via bidirectional approach,Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH, 1990, pp. 1764–1769.

  19. S. Seshu and M. B. Reed,Linear Graphs and Electrical Networks, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Self-propulsion at low Reynolds number,Phys. Rev. Lett.,58 (1987), 2051–2054.

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Sreenath, Nonlinear control of multibody systems in shape space,Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH, 1990, pp. 1776–1781.

  22. N. Sreenath, Y. G. Oh, P. S. Krishnaprasad, and J. E. Marsden, The dynamics of coupled planar rigid bodies, Part I: Reduction, equilibria and stability,Dynamics and Stability of Systems,3 (1988), 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Umetani and K. Yoshida, Resolved motion rate control of space manipulators using the generalized Jacobian matrix,IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation,5 (1989), 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Z. Vafa and S. Dubowsky, The kinematics and dynamics of space manipulators: the virtual manipulator approach,Internat. J. Robotics Res.,9 (1990), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Wittenburg,Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies, Tuebner, Stuttgart, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sreenath, N. Nonlinear control of planar multibody systems in shape space. Math. Control Signal Systems 5, 343–363 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02134010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02134010

Key words

Navigation