Skip to main content
Log in

Consumption factor scores of psychology journals: Scientometric properties and qualitative implications

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Consumption Factor has been proposed as a new measure of the significance/quality of scientific journals. The scientometric properties of this measure and its relationship to other commonly used measures of journal significance were examined. The results indicate a high correlation between the two component measures used to construct the Consumption Factor and a weak relationship between the Consumption Factor and other measures traditionally used to assess journal significance. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of the need for multiple measures of the significance of scientific journals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. E. CLARK,America's Psychologists: A Survey of a Growing Profession, American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C., 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. R. COLE, S. COLE, Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science,American Sociological Review, 32 (1967) 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. M. LAWANI, Citation Analysis and the Quality of Scientific Productivity,Bioscience, 27 (1977) 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. R. MYERS, Journal Citations and Scientific Eminence in Contemporary Psychology,American Psychologist, 25 (1970) 1041–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. E. BAYER, J. K. FOLGER, Some Correlates of a Citation Measure of Productivity in Science,Sociology of Education, 39 (1966) 381–390.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. O. HAGSTROM, Inputs, Outputs, and the Prestige of University Science Departments,Sociology of Education, 44 (1971) 375–397.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. C. ANDERSON, F. NARIN, P. McALLISTER, Publication Ratings Versus Peer Ratings of Universities,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 (1978) 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. L. SCHAEFFER, I. M. SULYMA, Citation Rates and the Quality of Canadian Psychology Departments,Canadian Psychological Review, 20 (1979) 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. C. BUSH, P. W. HAMELMAN, R. J. STAAF, A Quality Index for Economic Journals,Review of Economics and Statistics, 56 (1974) 123–125.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. ROCHE, D. L. SMITH, Frequency of Citations as Criterion for the Rankings of Departments, Journals, and Individuals,Sociological Inquiry, 48 (1978) 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. J. WHITE, K. G. WHITE, Citation Analysis of Psychology Journals,American Psychologist, 32 (1977) 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. I. YANOVSKY, Citation Analysis Significance of Scientific Journals,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. GARFIELD, M. V. MALIN, H. SMALL, Citation Data as Science Indicators, in Y. ELKANA, J. LEDERBERG, R. K. MERTON, A. THACKRAY, H. ZUCKERMAN Eds.,Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators, Wiley, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. KOULACK, H. J. KESELMAN, Ratings of Psychology Journals by Members of the American Psychological Association,American Psychologist, 30 (1975) 1049–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. G. HAWKINS, L. S. RITTER, I. WALTER, What Economists Think of their Journals,Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 1017–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. S. LUCE, D. M. JOHNSON, Rating of Educational and Psychological Journals,Educational Researcher, 7 (1978) 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. W. GILES, G. C., Jr. WRIGHT, Political Scientists' Evaluations of Sixty-three Journals,PS, 8 (1975) 254–256.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. D. GLENN, American Sociologists' Evaluations of Sixty-three Journals,The American Sociologist, 6 (1971) 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. M. LAWANI, Quality, Collaboration and Citations in Cancer Research: A Bibliometric Study. Ph. D. Dissertation, Florida State University, 1980.

  20. D. LINDSEY,The Scientific Publication System in Social Science, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. J. PRICE, Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology, and Nonscience, in C. E. NELSON and D. K. POLLOCK Eds,Communication among Scientists and Engineers, D. C. Heath, Lexington, Mass., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. GARFIELD,Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, Wiley, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. B. CATTELL, The Scree Test for the Number of Factors,Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1 (1966) 245–276.

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. C. MACE, H. D. WARNER, Ratings of Psychology Journals,American Psychologist, 28 (1973) 184–186.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. J. PRICE, Communication in Science: The Ends-Philosophy and Forecast, in A. REUCH and J. KNIGHT Eds,Ciba Foundation Symposium on Communication in Science: Documentation and Automation, Churchill, London, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. W. TUKEY, Keeping Research in Contact with the Literature: Citation Indices and Beyond.Journal of Chemical Documents, 2 (1962) 34.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. C. SMART, C. F. ELTON, Structural Characteristics and Citation Rates of Education Journals,American Educational Research Journal, 18 (1981) 399–413.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. S. CAMERON, Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Education,Administrative Science Quarterly, 23 (1978) 604–632.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. J. CLARK, R. T. HARTNETT, L. J. BAIRD,Assessing Dimensions of Quality in Graduate Education, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N. J., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  30. L. L. CUMMINGS, D. P. SCHWAB,Performance in Organizations, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, Ill., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. M. STEERS,Organizational Effectiveness: A Behavioral View, Goodyear, Santa Monica, Cal., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  32. E. GARFIELD, Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation,Science, 178 (1972) 471–479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. D. W. Jr. LIGHT, The Structure of the Academic Profession,Sociology of Education, 47 (1974) 2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. C. SMART, C. F. ELTON, Goal Orientations of Academic Departments: A Test of Biglan's Model,Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (1975) 580–588.

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. BIGLAN, Relationship between Subject Matter Characteristics and the Structure and Output of University Departments,Journal of Applied Psychology, 57 (1973) 204–213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smart, J.C., Elton, C.F. Consumption factor scores of psychology journals: Scientometric properties and qualitative implications. Scientometrics 4, 349–360 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02135121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02135121

Keywords

Navigation