Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of directed formulations for the capacitated minimal spanning tree problem

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we compare linear integer programming directed formulations for the capacitated minimal spanning tree (CMST) problem. This problem is directly related to network design and consists of finding the cheapest way to link a set of terminals at different locations with a central node (a computer site, for instance). The present work focuses on a single commodity flow formulation presented in [3,4]. This formulation includes two sets of variables and, hence, it also must include coupling constraints between the two sets of variables. These coupling constraints can be defined in several ways. The main result of this work establishes that when the strongest form of the coupling constraints is used in the flow formulation (as in [4]), the “equivalent” formulation using only theX ij variables satisfies the so-called multistar constraints. These constraints are shown to be stronger than the weakest form of the generalized subtour breaking constraints and, hence, our result improves on the characterization given in [5] for the flow formulation presented in [4]. For certain parameters, the multistar constraints induce facets of the non-directed CMST polytope (see [2]). We also show that it is not possible to compare the linear relaxations of a formulation that involves the multistar constraints with one that involves the generalized subtour breaking constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Araque, A polyhedral approach to vehicle routing, presented at the ORSA/TIMS Joint National Meeting (1989).

  2. J. Araque, L. Hall and T. Magnanti, Capacitated trees, capacitated routing and associated polyhedra, C.O.R.E. Discussion Paper (1990).

  3. B. Gavish, Formulations and algorithms for the capacitated minimal directed tree problem, Networks 12(1982)355–377.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Gavish, Topological design of centralized computer networks: Formulations and algorithms, J. ACM 30(1983)118–132.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Gavish, Augmented Lagrangian based algorithms for centralized network design, IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-33(1985)1247–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Gavish and K. Altinkemer, Parallel savings heuristics for the topological design of local access tree networks, in:Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 86 Conf. (1986).

  7. M. Gondran and M. Minoux,Graphs and Algorithms (Wiley, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Gouveia, Determinação da arvore de suporte de custo mínimo com restrições de capacidade: Formulações e algoritmos, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lisbon (May 1991).

  9. L. Gouveia, A 2n-constraint formulation for the capacitated minimal spanning tree problem, presented at theEuro XI Conf. (July, 1991) and at theWorkshop on Large-Scale Optimization, Coimbra (July 1991).

  10. L. Gouveia and J. Paixão, Dynamic programming based heuristics for the topological design of local access networks, Ann. Oper. Res. 33(1991)305–327.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Gouveia and J. Paixão, A state space relaxation for the capacitated minimal spanning tree problem, presented at theEURO XI Conf. (July 1991) and at theWorkshop on Large-Scale Optimization, Coimbra (July 1991).

  12. L. Gouveia, A. Lucena and J. Paixão, A set-partitioning approach for the capacitated minimal spanning tree problem, presented at theEuro X Conf., Belgrade (June 1989) and at the1st ORSA Telecommunications SIG Conf., Operations Research in Telecommunications, Boca Raton (March 1990).

  13. L.A. Hall, Two topics in discrete optimizations: Polyhedral structure of capacitated trees and approximation algorithms for scheduling, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT (1989).

  14. A. Kershenbaum and W. Chou, A unified algorithm for designing multidrop teleprocessing networks, IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-22(1974)1762–1772.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Paixão and L. Gouveia, Métodos de investigação operacional na idealização topológica de redes centralizadas, Actas do 4o Congresso Português de Informática 2b(1986)1625–1655.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Papadimitriou, The complexity of the capacitated tree problem, Networks 8(1978)217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Tanenbaum,Computer Networks (Prentice-Hall, 1977).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DEIO - CEAUL, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. 24 de Julho, 134 5o, 1300, Lisboa, Portugal

    Luis Gouveia

Authors
  1. Luis Gouveia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gouveia, L. A comparison of directed formulations for the capacitated minimal spanning tree problem. Telecommunication Systems 1, 51–76 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02136155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02136155

Keywords

Search

Navigation