Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative studies of literature. A critique and an outlook

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper is a critique of quantitative studies of literature. It is argued that such studies are involved in an act of reification, in which, moreover, fundamental ingredients of the texts, e.g. their (highly important) range of figurative meanings, are eliminated from the analysis. Instead a concentration on lower levels of linguistic organization, such as grammar and lexis, may be observed, in spite of the fact that these are often the least relevant aspects of the text. In doing so, quantitative studies of literature significantly reduce not only the cultural value of texts, but also the generalizability of its own findings. What is needed, therefore, is an awareness and readiness to relate to matters of textuality as an organizing principle underlying the cultural functioning of literary works of art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ehlich, K. “Zum Textbegriff” (On the Concept of Text). In Text — Textsorten — Semantik (Text — Text Types — Semantics). Hamburg: Buske, 1984, pp. 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enkvist, N. E. “Style as Parameters in Text Strategy.” InThe Taming of the Text. Ed. W. van Peer. London: Routledge, 1988, pp. 125–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. “What is Stylistics and Why are They Saying Such Terrible Things About It?” InApproaches to Poetics. Ed. S. Chatman. Columbia: Columbia University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J.The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J.The Logic of Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Peer, W.Stylistics and Psychology. Investigations of Foregrounding. London: Croom Helm, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Peer, W. How to Do Things with Texts. InReading, Analysing and Teaching Literature. Ed. M. H. Short. London: Longman, 1989, pp. 267–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Peer, W. and E. Andringa. “Stylistic Intuitions. An Empirical Study.” Language and Style (forthcoming).

  • Van Peer, W. and J. Renkema, eds.Pragmatics and Stylistics. Louvain: Acco, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, I. A.Practical Criticism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Willie van Peer is Associate Professor of Literary Theory at the University of Utrecht (The Netherlands), author of Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding (Croom Helm, 1986) and editor ofThe Taming of the Text: Explorations in Language, Literature and Culture (Routledge, 1988). His major research interests lie in theory formation and its epistemological problems, and in the interrelationship between literary form and function.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Peer, W. Quantitative studies of literature. A critique and an outlook. Comput Hum 23, 301–307 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02176635

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02176635

Key Words

Navigation