Abstract
Competitive analysis of plants is fundamental to enhancing the competitiveness of manufacturing firms. Moving Frontier Analysis (MFA), proposed in this paper, is a new application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to conduct competitive analysis of a high-technology manufacturing plant. The development and application of MFA was done in collaboration with the management of a US merchant semiconductor manufacturing firm. A wafer fabrication plant of the firm served as the research site for this study. MFA provides a means to determine (i) the gap between a plant's best performance and the best of competition, and (ii) whether or not it will be possible to close this performance gap, and if so, the time it will take to do so. From an implementation standpoint, competitive analysis using MFA can be conducted even if (i) accurate and detailed data on comparable plants of competitor companies are not available, and (ii) the operations of competitors' plants are dynamically changing. An application of MFA for conducting competitive analysis of the wafer fabrication plant is presented. This application illustrates how MFA makes it possible to estimate (i) the unit cost of production for the best of competitors' plants using aggregate operational information on industry best practices, and (ii) the time it will take for the plant's unit cost of production to catch up with the best of competition using the technologies in operation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, V., I. Bardhan and W.W. Cooper, Primal and dual optimality in DEA computer codes, inOperations Research: Methods, Models and Applications, J. Aranson and S. Zionts, eds., Quorum Books, New York, 1993.
Banker, R.D., Productivity measurement and management control, inManagement of Productivity and Technology in Manufacturing, P. Kleindorfer, ed., Plenum, 1985, pp. 239–257,
Banker, R.D., I. Bardhan, W.W. Cooper, K.K. Sinha and R.M. Thrall, Projection operators in DEA, Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1993; see also Chapter 5 in this volume.
Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, J. Swarts and D.A. Thomas, An introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis with some of its models and their uses, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting 5, 1989, 125–163.
Banker, R.D. and R.C. Morey, Estimating production frontier shifts: An application of DEA to technology assessment, Annals of Operations Research, 1996, Chapter 8 in this volume.
Bauer, P.W., Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers, Journal of Econometrics 46, 1990, 39–56.
Borrus, M. and R.C. Leachman, The competitive semiconductor manufacturing survey: First reports on results on the main phase, Systems Research Center, Center for Research in Management Report and Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, No. CSM-02, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1993.
Caves, R. and D. Barton,Efficiency in U.S. Manufacturing Industries, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, Silhoutte functions of short run cost behavior, Quarterly Journal of Economics 68, 1954, 131–150.
Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, Auditing and accounting for program efficiency and management efficiency in not-for-profit entities, Accounting, Organizations and Society 5, 1980, 87–107.
Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 1978, 429–444.
Cooper, W.W. and A. Gallegos, A combined DEA-stochastic frontier approach to Latin American airline efficiency evaluations, Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1991.
Cooper, W.W., K.K. Sinha and R.S. Sullivan, Measuring complexity in high-technology manufacturing indexes for evaluation, Interfaces 22, 1992, 38–48.
Cooper, W.W., K.K. Sinha and R.S. Sullivan, Accounting for complexity in costing high technology manufacturing, European Journal of Operational Research 85, 1995, 316–326.
Cooper, W.W., K.K. Sinha and R.S. Sullivan, Evaluating the information content of a measure of plant output: An application to high-technology manufacturing, Annals of Operations Research, special volume on Computational Economics, 1996, to appear.
Cooper, W.W., R.G. Thompson and R.M. Thrall, Introduction: Extensions and new developments in DEA, Annals of Operations Research, 1996, Chapter 1 in this volume.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang, Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industralized countries, American Economic Review 84, 1994, 66–83.
Gross, N., O. Port and R. Brandt, Making deals — without giving away the store, Business Week, June 17, 1991, 96–98.
Hayes, R.H., S.C. Wheelwright and K.B. Clark,Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization, The Free Press, New York, 1988.
Indreko, O., Assessment of Japan capabilities for SEMATECH, Austin, TX, 1989.
Leibenstein, R.C., Allocative efficiency vs. X-efficiency, American Economic Review 56, 1966, 392–415.
Leong, G.K., D.L. Snyder and P.T. Ward, Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy, Omega 18, 1990, 109–122.
Lewin, A. and C.A.K. Lovell, Editors' Introduction, Journal of Econometrics 46, 1990, 3–5 (special issue on Parametric and Nonparametric Approaches to Frontier Estimation).
Lieberman, M.B., L.J. Lau and M.D. Williams, Firm level productivity and management influence: A comparison of U.S. and Japanese automobile producers, Management Science 36, 1990, 1193–1215.
Oral, M., A methodology for competitiveness analysis and strategy formulation in the glass industry, European Journal of Operational Research 68, 1993, 9–22.
Park, R.E. and B.M. Mitchell, Estimating the autocorrelated error model with trended data, Journal of Econometrics 13, 1980, 185–201.
Prescott, J.E. and J.H. Grant, A manager's guide for evaluating competitive analysis techniques, Interfaces 18, 1988, 10–22.
Sinha, K.K., Models for evaluation of complex technological systems: Strategic applications in high technology manufacturing, unpublished Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1991. Also available from University Microfilm, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Tucker, F.G., S.M. Zivian and R.C. Camp, How to measure yourself against the best, Harvard Business Review 65, 1987, 8–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sinha, K.K. Chapter 9 Moving frontier analysis: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis for competitive analysis of a high-technology manufacturing plant. Ann Oper Res 66, 197–218 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187591
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187591