Skip to main content
Log in

Design for a fax

  • Published:
Personal Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We argue that button-controlled devices can be made better to improve their usability, and that there are routine ways to do so that can be effectively employed in the early stages of the design process.

By way of example, we examine the design of a 1993/4 domestic phone/fax/answerphone machine, and show that alternative designs have quantitative advantages over the original. We point to many strange — obscure, undocumented, non-functional — features, and raise questions about the process that led to the design, and what role either human factors or computer science played in it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norman D A.The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gibbs S J and Tsichritzis D C.Multimedia Programming. Addison-Wesley, 1994.

  3. Thimbleby H W and Ladkin P B. A proper explanation when you need one, in M A R Kirby A J Dix and J E Finlay (Eds),BCS Conference HCI'95, People and Computers, X, 107–118, Cambridge University Press, 1995.

  4. Thimbleby H W. A Note on Menu Selection.Computer Bulletin, Series 2, No. 18, 20, 21 and 23, 1978.

  5. Witten I H, Cleary J and Greenberg S. On frequency-based menu-splitting algorithms,International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21(2), 135–148, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen J.Usability Engineering. Academic Press, 1993.

  7. Thimbleby H W. “Formulating Usability,”ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 26(2), 59–64, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thimbleby H W and Addison M A. Hyperdoc: An Interactive System Development Tool, in M. A. R. Kirby, A. J. Dix and J. E. Finlay (Eds),BCS Conference HCI'95, People and Computers, X, 95–106, Cambridge University Press, 1995.

  9. Card S K Moran T and Newell A.The Psychology of Human — Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.

  10. Knuth D E. The Art of Computer Programming. 3 (Sorting and Searching), Addison-Wesley, 1973.

  11. Alexander C. A city is not a tree.Design, 206, 46–55, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thimbleby H W and Witten I H. User Modelling as Machine Identification: New Design Methods for HCI, inAdvances in Human Computer Interaction, IV, 58–86, D. Hix & H. R. Hartson, (Eds), Ablex, 1993.

  13. BT (undated),DF200 User guide (Apparently coded: UM DF200 23175349-2), British Telecommunications plc., London.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold Thimbleby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thimbleby, H. Design for a fax. Personal Technologies 1, 101–117 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199215

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199215

Keywords

Navigation