Skip to main content
Log in

Mean-risk analysis of risk aversion and wealth effects on optimal portfolios with multiple investment opportunities

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we first define risk in an axiomatic way and a class of utility functions suitable for the so-called mean-risk analysis. Then, we show that, in a portfolio selection problem with multiple risky investments, an investor who is more risk averse in the Arrow-Pratt sense prefers less risk, in the sense of this paper, with less mean return, and an investor who displays increasing (decreasing) relative risk aversion becomes more conservative (aggressive) as the initial capital increases. The risk aversion effect for diversification on optimal portfolios is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.J. Arrow,Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Markham, Chicago, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.P. Bertsekas, Necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of an optimal portfolio, J. Econ. Theory 8 (1974) 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.J. Elton and M.J. Gruber,Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.C. Fishburn and R.B. Porter, Optimal portfolios with one safe and one risky asset: Effects of changes in rate of return and risk, Manag. Sci. 22 (1976) 1064–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.V. Gnedenko and A.N. Kolmogorov,Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables (translated from the Russian and annotated by K.L. Chung, with an appendix by J.L. Doob) (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Hanoch and H. Levy, The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk, Rev. Econ. Studies 36 (1969) 335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.E. Ingersoll Jr.,Theory of Financial Decision Making (Rowman and Littlefield, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Jewitt, Risk aversion and the choice between risky prospects: The preservation of comparative statics results, Rev. Econ. Studies 54 (1987) 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Jewitt, Choosing between risky prospects: The characterization of comparative statics results, and location independent risk, Manag. Sci. 35 (1989) 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.G. Kallberg and W.T. Ziemba, Comparison of alternative utility functions in portfolio selection problems, Manag. Sci. 29 (1983) 1257–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Karlin,Total Positivity, Vol. 1 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kijima and M. Ohnishi, Stochastic dominance by functional characterization approach: Fundamental results and applications, Technical Report No. 92-12, Graduate School of Systems Management, The University of Tsukuba, Tokyo (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Kira and W.T. Ziemba, The demand for a risky set, Manag. Sci. 26 (1980) 1158–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Konno, Piecewise linear risk functions and portfolio optimization, J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan 33 (1990) 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Konno and H. Yamazaki, A mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to Tokyo stock market, Manag. Sci. 37 (1991) 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Lehmann, Ordered families of distributions, Ann. Math. Statist. 26 (1955) 399–419.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Levy, Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis, Manag. Sci. 38 (1992) 555–593.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Li and W.T. Ziemba, Characterizations of optimal portfolios by univariate and multivariate risk aversion, Manag. Sci. 35 (1989) 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P.L. McEntire, Portfolio theory for independent assets, Manag. Sci. 30 (1984) 952–963.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern,Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.W. Pratt, Risk aversion in the small and the large, Econometrica 32 (1964) 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S.J. Press,Applied Multivariate Analysis (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  24. S.M. Ross,Stochastic Processes (Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M.E. Rubinstein, A comparative statics analysis of risk premiums, J. Bus. 12 (1973) 605–615.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Stoyan,Comparison Methods for Queues and Other Stochastic Models (edited with revision by D.J. Daley) (Wiley, Chichester, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  27. W.T. Ziemba, Choosing investments when the returns have stable distributions, in:Mathematical Programming in Theory and Practice, eds. P.L. Hammer and G. Zoutendijk (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974) pp. 443–482.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kijima, M., Ohnishi, M. Mean-risk analysis of risk aversion and wealth effects on optimal portfolios with multiple investment opportunities. Ann Oper Res 45, 147–163 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02282046

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02282046

Keywords

Navigation