Abstract
Although impact factor and related measurements are the best-known features of scientific journals, other characteristics are of particular interest. The way a journal reflects the internationalized nature of science may be determined by many methods, one of which is based on the distribution of authoring and citing countries. This can be systematically measured either by a comparison of these distributions with averages profiles of a discipline or specialty, or by concentration indexes on the other. This paper focuses on the first approach. As the average profile of science drifts with the level of visibility, stratification by impact level is discussed. In this study, experimental internationalization indexes were calculated on the SCI for journals belonging to Earth&Space and Applied Biology. Convergence of measurements (types of indexes, type of normalization, publication vs citation scope) is adressed. Internationalization indexes may have a variety of applications, including characterization of the scientific publishing market and sampling of the SCI for science indicators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. Garfield, Citation as a tool in journal evaluation,Science, 178 (4060) (1972) 471–479.
F. Narin et al.,Evaluative Bibliometrics: the use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, Report prepared for the National Science Foundation, Contract NSF C-627, 1976, 456 p.
S. Katz, D. Hicks, The classification of interdisciplinary journals: a new approach, In:5th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics,M.E.D. Koenig andA. Bookstein (Eds), Learned Information Inc., Medford, 1995, pp. 245–254.
L. Leydesdorff, S. Cozzens, The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the SCI,Scientometrics, 26 (1) (1993) 135–156.
F. H. Christensen, P. Ingwersen, Online citation analysis. A methodological approach,Scientometrics, 37 (1) (1996) 36–92.
G. Sivertsen, Nar er et tidsskrift internatasjonalt, In:Det Vitenskapelige tiddskrift, Gleditsch, TemaNord, 1994, pp. 37–51.
A. Sigogneau,Approche scientométrique de la définition d'un domaine de recherche par des revues scientifiques, Thèse Information Scientifique et Technique, Université Paris VII, Paris, 1995, 275 p.
T. Luukkonen, R.J.W. Tijssen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, The measurement of international scientific collaboration,Scientometrics, 28 (1) (1993) 15–36.
M. Zitt, F. Perrot, R. Barré, The transition from “national” to “transnational” model and related measures of countries performances, to be published inJournal of the American Society for Information Science, November 1997, p. 13.
T. Braun, E. Bujdoso, Gatekeeping patterns in the publication of analytical chemistry research,Talanta, 30 (3) (1983) 161–167.
A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun, Scientometrics datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 16 (1989) 3–478.
M. Zitt, E. Bassecoulard, Internationalization of scientific journals: a measurement based on publication and citation scope, In: Proceedings of theSixth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics,B.C. Peritz andL. Egghe (Eds), The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 1995, pp. 517–529.
H. F. Moed, R. E. De Bruin, T. N. Van Leeuwen, New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications,Scientometrics, 33 (3) (1995) 381–422.
G. Sivertsen, Should a new bibliometric database for international comparisons be more restricted in journal coverage?, In:Science and Technology in a policy context, Selected Proceedings of the Joint EC-Leiden Conference on Science & Technology Indicators, DSWO Press, 1992, pp. 35–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E. Internationalization of scientific journals: A measurement based on publication and citation scope. Scientometrics 41, 255–271 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457982
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457982