Abstract
Co-authorship analyses are both difficult to perform and interpret. We have devised a new way of calculating and representing hierarchical author networks that depict relationships among authors in a more exhaustive and less equivocal manner than most available automatic analyses. Any structure, however complex, can be broken down into independent subclusters of authors that can be represented as individual interconnected networks. We illustrate our approach by analysing the authors of publications giving the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) as an affiliation in 1994 (from the ISI 1994 CD-ROM). The networks can be interpreted by referring to the official EMBL staff list (Annual Report 1993) and, in terms of research topics, by consulting the article titles and abstracts. In this respect, correspondence analyses of the author-publication matrices—that are the counterparts of the author-author matrices—prove extremely useful in structuring the thematic information. In fact, both methods—the hierarchical author networks and the correspondence analysis biplots—mutually enrich each other and provide a global picture of the inherent structure and interests of the EMBL as given by their 1994 publications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ISI. Citation analysis suggests multinational coauthorship has leveled off.Science Watch, 7 (1996) 1–2. Reprinted inThe Scientist, 10 (1996) 13 & 16.
D. E. Chubin, Beyond invisible colleges: Inspirations and aspirations of post-1972 social studies of science.Scientometrics, 7 (1985), 221–254.
H. Kretschmer, Patterns of behaviour in coauthorship networks of invisible colleges.Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 579–591.
D. M. Hicks, J. C. Katz, Where is science going?Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21 (1996) 379–406.
G. Melin, O. Persson, Studying research collaboration using co-authorships.Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 363–377.
D. de B. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship.Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84.
Y. Okubo, J. F. Miquel, L. Frigoletto, J. C. Doré, Structure of international collaboration in science: Typology of countries through multivariate techniques using a link indicator.Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 321–351.
C. De Lange, W. Glänzel, Modelling and measuring multilateral co-authorship in international scientific collaboration. Part I. Development of a new model using a series expansion approach.Scientometrics, 49 (1997) 593–604.
N. C. Mullins, The development of a scientific specialty: The Phage Group and the origins of molecular biology.Minerva, 10 (1972) 51–82.
T. D. Stokes, J. A. Hartley, Co-authorship, social structure and influence within specialities.Social Studies of Science (Sage), 19 (1989) 101–125.
O. Persson, M. Beckmann, Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialities.Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 351–366.
H. Rostaing, M. C. Suraud, L. Quoniam, Les réseaux de compétences: Application à l'élaboration d'un groupe de recherche en physique fondamentale. In:Proceedings of the Journées d'Etudes de la Société Française de Bibliométrie Appliquée (lle Rousse, Corsica, June 9–11, 1993), 14 (1995) 377–391.
S. J. Cunningham, S. M. Dillon, Authorship patterns in information systems.Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 19–27.
H. P. F. Peters, A. F. J. van Raan, Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis. An exercise on a university faculty level.Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 235–255.
D. Rennie, V. Yank, L. Emanuel, When authorship fails.Journal of the American Medical Association, 278 (1997) 579–585.
R. Smith, Authorship is dying: long live contributorship.British Medical Journal, 315 (1997) 696.
D. J. De Solla Price, D. de B. Beaver, Collaboration in an invisible college.American Psychologist, 31 (1996) 1011–1018.
Editorial & News, Defection from EMBL; Italy to quit European Biology Laboratory in protest over staffing policy.Nature, 370 (1994) 203–205.
M. Abd El Kader, J. F. Miquel, A. Paul, J. C. Doré, Une méthode d'analyse des thémes et réseaux de la coopération scientifique nationale et internationale sur les céramiques dans la base SCI. In:Proceedings of the Journées d'Etudes de la Société Française de Bibliométrie Appliquée (lle Rousse, Corsica, June 9–11, 1993), 14 (1995) 147–164.
J. F. Miquel, T. Ojasoo, Y. Okubo, A. Paul, J. C. Doré, World science in 18 disciplinary areas: Comparative evaluation of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981–1992.Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 149–167.
P. S. Nagpaul, L. Sharma, Science in the eighties: A typology of countries based on inter-field priorities.Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 263–283.
J. C. Doré, T. Ojasoo, Y. Okubo, T. Durand, G. Dudognon, J. F. Miquel, Correspondence factor analysis of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981–1992.Journal of the American Society for the Information of Science, 47(8) (1996) 588–602.
Y. Okubo, J. C. Doré, T. Ojasoo, J. F. Miquel, A multivariate analysis of publication trends in the 1980s with special reference to South-East Asia.Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 273–289.
J. P. Benzécri,L'Analyse des Données. Tome I: La Taxinomie, Bordas/Dunod, Paris 1973, pp. 67–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abd el Kader, M., Ojasoo, T., Miquel, J.F. et al. Hierarchical author networks: An analysis of European molecular biology laboratory (EMBL) publications. Scientometrics 42, 405–421 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458379
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458379