Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchical author networks: An analysis of European molecular biology laboratory (EMBL) publications

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Co-authorship analyses are both difficult to perform and interpret. We have devised a new way of calculating and representing hierarchical author networks that depict relationships among authors in a more exhaustive and less equivocal manner than most available automatic analyses. Any structure, however complex, can be broken down into independent subclusters of authors that can be represented as individual interconnected networks. We illustrate our approach by analysing the authors of publications giving the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) as an affiliation in 1994 (from the ISI 1994 CD-ROM). The networks can be interpreted by referring to the official EMBL staff list (Annual Report 1993) and, in terms of research topics, by consulting the article titles and abstracts. In this respect, correspondence analyses of the author-publication matrices—that are the counterparts of the author-author matrices—prove extremely useful in structuring the thematic information. In fact, both methods—the hierarchical author networks and the correspondence analysis biplots—mutually enrich each other and provide a global picture of the inherent structure and interests of the EMBL as given by their 1994 publications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISI. Citation analysis suggests multinational coauthorship has leveled off.Science Watch, 7 (1996) 1–2. Reprinted inThe Scientist, 10 (1996) 13 & 16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. E. Chubin, Beyond invisible colleges: Inspirations and aspirations of post-1972 social studies of science.Scientometrics, 7 (1985), 221–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Kretschmer, Patterns of behaviour in coauthorship networks of invisible colleges.Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 579–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. M. Hicks, J. C. Katz, Where is science going?Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21 (1996) 379–406.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Melin, O. Persson, Studying research collaboration using co-authorships.Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. de B. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship.Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Okubo, J. F. Miquel, L. Frigoletto, J. C. Doré, Structure of international collaboration in science: Typology of countries through multivariate techniques using a link indicator.Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 321–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. De Lange, W. Glänzel, Modelling and measuring multilateral co-authorship in international scientific collaboration. Part I. Development of a new model using a series expansion approach.Scientometrics, 49 (1997) 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. C. Mullins, The development of a scientific specialty: The Phage Group and the origins of molecular biology.Minerva, 10 (1972) 51–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. D. Stokes, J. A. Hartley, Co-authorship, social structure and influence within specialities.Social Studies of Science (Sage), 19 (1989) 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. Persson, M. Beckmann, Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialities.Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Rostaing, M. C. Suraud, L. Quoniam, Les réseaux de compétences: Application à l'élaboration d'un groupe de recherche en physique fondamentale. In:Proceedings of the Journées d'Etudes de la Société Française de Bibliométrie Appliquée (lle Rousse, Corsica, June 9–11, 1993), 14 (1995) 377–391.

  13. S. J. Cunningham, S. M. Dillon, Authorship patterns in information systems.Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. P. F. Peters, A. F. J. van Raan, Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis. An exercise on a university faculty level.Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Rennie, V. Yank, L. Emanuel, When authorship fails.Journal of the American Medical Association, 278 (1997) 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Smith, Authorship is dying: long live contributorship.British Medical Journal, 315 (1997) 696.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. J. De Solla Price, D. de B. Beaver, Collaboration in an invisible college.American Psychologist, 31 (1996) 1011–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Editorial & News, Defection from EMBL; Italy to quit European Biology Laboratory in protest over staffing policy.Nature, 370 (1994) 203–205.

  19. M. Abd El Kader, J. F. Miquel, A. Paul, J. C. Doré, Une méthode d'analyse des thémes et réseaux de la coopération scientifique nationale et internationale sur les céramiques dans la base SCI. In:Proceedings of the Journées d'Etudes de la Société Française de Bibliométrie Appliquée (lle Rousse, Corsica, June 9–11, 1993), 14 (1995) 147–164.

  20. J. F. Miquel, T. Ojasoo, Y. Okubo, A. Paul, J. C. Doré, World science in 18 disciplinary areas: Comparative evaluation of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981–1992.Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. S. Nagpaul, L. Sharma, Science in the eighties: A typology of countries based on inter-field priorities.Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. C. Doré, T. Ojasoo, Y. Okubo, T. Durand, G. Dudognon, J. F. Miquel, Correspondence factor analysis of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981–1992.Journal of the American Society for the Information of Science, 47(8) (1996) 588–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Okubo, J. C. Doré, T. Ojasoo, J. F. Miquel, A multivariate analysis of publication trends in the 1980s with special reference to South-East Asia.Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. P. Benzécri,L'Analyse des Données. Tome I: La Taxinomie, Bordas/Dunod, Paris 1973, pp. 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abd el Kader, M., Ojasoo, T., Miquel, J.F. et al. Hierarchical author networks: An analysis of European molecular biology laboratory (EMBL) publications. Scientometrics 42, 405–421 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458379

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458379

Keywords

Navigation