Skip to main content
Log in

Metatheorizing citation

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews a variety of perspectives on citation. It argues that citations have multiple articulations in that they inform our understanding of the socio-cultural, cognitive, and textual aspects of scientific communication. Two metatheoretical frameworks are proposed as a means of negotiating the interpretative differences which characterize the various discourse communities concerned with citation theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becher, T. (1989),Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, Milton Keynes: OUP

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ari, E. (1987), On acknowledgements in ethnographies,Journal of Anthropological Research, 43 (1), 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Wagner, D.G., Zelditch, M. (1989), Theory growth, social processes, and metatheory. In:Turner, J.H. (Ed.),Theory Building in Sociology: Assessing Theoretical Cumulation, Sage: London, 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990),Homo Academicus, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991),Language & Symbolic Power,Thompson,J. B. (Ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodkey, L. (1987),Academic Writing as Social Practice, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubin, D. E. (1975), Trusted assessorship in science: a relation in need of data,Social Studies of Science, 5, 362–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (1981), The need for a theory of citing,Journal of citing, Journal of Documentation, 37 (1), 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (1984),The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, London: Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (1994), Tiered citation and measures of document similarity,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(7), 537–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (1995),The Scholar's Courtesy: The Role of Acknowledgement in The Primary Communication Process, London: Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (1996), Rates of return to citation,Journal of Documentation, 52(2), 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (1997),Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1985), Consequences. In:Mitchell, W. J. T. (Ed.),Against Theory: Literary Studies and the New Pragmatism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 106–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984),The Constitution of Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, A. (1997),The Footnote: A Curious History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, W. O. (1982), Gift giving as an organizing principle in science. In:Barnes, B., Edge, D. (Eds),Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemlin, S. (1996), Research on research evaluation,Social Epistemology, 10(2), 209–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., Potter, K. (1991), Sociology of scientific knowledge: a reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science,Social Studies of Science, 21, 459–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjørland, B. (1997),Information Seeking and Subject Representation: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Information Science, Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, F. R. (1973),Science Observed: Science as a Social and Intellectual Activity, London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1982), The cycle of credibility. In:Barnes, B., Edge, D. (Eds),Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1998), Theories of citation? Scientometrics (this issue).

  • Macintosh, N.B., Scapens, R.W. (1990), Structuration theory in management accounting,Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 15(5), 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRoberts, M. (1997), Letter to the Editor,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRoberts, M. H., MacRoberts, B. R. (1989), Problems of citation analysis: a critical review,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (1991), Communication, competition, and secrecy: the production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics,Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(4), 491–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, A. J. (1974),Communication in Science, London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I. (1974), Norms and counter norms in a select group of Apollo moon scientists: a case study of the ambivalence of scientists,American Sociological Review, 39, 579–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, N. C. (1973),Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, H. (1996),Managers and Information in Organizations: Towards a Structurational Concept of the Information use Environment of Managers, Syracuse, NY: Graduate School Syracuse University, PhD thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R. (1989), Perceptions and evaluation of quality in science. In:Gholson, B, et al. (Eds),Psychology of Science, Contributions to Metascience, Cambridge: CUP, 383–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1994),A Social History of Truth, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestone, R., Hirsch, E., Morley, D. (1992), Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In:Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E. (Eds),Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, London: Routledge, 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1991), Invisible work and silenced dialogues in knowledge representation. In:Eriksson, B., Kitchenham, B., Tijdens, K. (Eds),Women, Work and Computerization, Amsterdam: North Holland, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1996), Supporting articulation work. In:Kling, R. (Ed.),Computerization and Controversy Value Conflicts and Social Choices, New York: Academic Press, 2nd. ed., 407–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. R. (1989), A second example of mutually isolated medical literatures related by implicit, unnoticed connections,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(6), 432–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1989), Introduction: can sociology be a cumulative science? In:Turner, J. H. (Ed.),Theory Building in Sociology: Assessing Theoretical Cumulation, London: Sage, 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (1994), The origins of ‘mainstream sociology’ and other issues in the history of American sociology,Social Epistemology, 8(1), 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Braam, R. R. (1991),Mapping of Science: Foci of Intellectual Interest in Scientific Literature, Leiden: University of Leiden: DSWO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakkari, P. (1997), Information seeking in context: a challenging metatheory. In:Vakkari, P., Savolainen, R., Dervin, B. (Eds),Information Seeking in Context, London: Taylor Graham, 451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakkari, P., Kuokkanen, M. (1997), Theory growth in information science: applications of the theory of science to a theory of information seeking,Journal of Documentation, 53(5), 497–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, B. (1997), Metatheory and information science,Journal of Documentation, 53(5), 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J. (1990), Semiotics, information science, documents and computers,Journal of Documentation, 46(1), 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Roberts, K. (1993), Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flightdecks,Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (1990), Author co-citation analysis: overview and defense. In:Borgman, C. L. (Ed.),Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 84–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Comments on Theories of Citation?L. Leydesdorff,Scientometrics, 43 (1998) No. 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cronin, B. Metatheorizing citation. Scientometrics 43, 45–55 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458393

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458393

Keywords

Navigation