Skip to main content
Log in

A new model of scientific colloboration part 1. Theoretical approach

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study deals with the uniformity of the collaboration process within the scientist's system by describing all two-dimensional and three-dimensional referential patterns with only one nonliear function. The variety of these patterns is expressed in dependence upon the conditions or environment that induced them by means of varying the parameters of this non-linear function. Based on their similarity these various patterns can be divided into different types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Argyle, M. (1992), Soziale Beziehungen. In:Stroebe, M. Hewstone, J.-P. Codol and andG. M. Stephenson (Ed.),Soziologie: Eine Einführung, 232–257. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York; London; Paris; Tokyo; Hong Kong; Barcelona; Budapest: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marsden, P. V. (1981), Models and methods for characterizing the structural parameters of groups.Social Networks, 3: 1–27.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolf, CH. (1996),Gleich und gleich gesellt sich. Individuelle und struckturelle Einflüsse auf die Entstehung von Freundschaften. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Winch, R. F., T. Ktsanes, V. Ktsanes (1954), The theory of complementary needs in mate-selection: An analytical and descriptive study.American Sociological Review, 19: 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lazarsfeld, P. F., R. K. Merton (1954), Friendship as social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In:M. Berger, T. Abel andC. H. Page (Eds),Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18–66, Toronto et al., Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kretschmer, H. (1994), Coauthroship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities.Scientometrics 30: 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Price, D. J. De Solla (1963),Little Science, Big, Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kretschmer, H. (1992), Significance of the logarithm of number of publications for the measurement of social stratification in coauthorship networks. In:I. K. Ravichandra Rao (Ed.),Informetrics 91, Selected Papers from the Third International Conference on Informetrics, 9–12 August, 1991, Bangalore, 289–331. Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kretschmer, H. (1996), Die Gemeinschaft der Wissenschaftler-Ein nichtlineares dynamisches System im Verlaufe von 5000 Jahren. In:Hg. Meyer ed.,25 Jahre Wissenschftsforschung, 34–55. Berlin: Schrittenreihe des Wissenschaftssoziologie und-statistik e. V.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer, E. P. (1997),Das Schöne und das Biest. Ästhetische Momente in der Wissenschaft, München: Piper Verlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haken, H., M. Haken-Krell (1992),Erfolgsgeheimnisse in der Wahrnehmung, Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kretschmer, H. A new model of scientific colloboration part 1. Theoretical approach. Scientometrics 46, 501–518 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459607

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459607

Keywords