Skip to main content
Log in

Using online databases to form subject collections for informetric analyses

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The online databases of the Dialog System retrieve only 26% of documents in an exhaustively compiled collection on the subject of Bradford's Law of Scattering, with some documents being retrieved from many databases. However, when the Exhaustive Collection is more stringently defined to include only those documents more about the subject, the retrieval rate of Dialog improves to 61%, while its most productive database, LISA, alone retrieves 37%. Both of these ‘samples’ give good estimates of the size-invariant properties of the Exhaustive Collection which are typically studied in Bradford and Growth Analyses—vindicating this use of online searching. However, without additional information, online searches are of little use in determining size-related properties of subject literature collections. Whether the analysis reported here—which relies on identical interpretations of a ‘subject’—has secure foundations is briefly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bookstein, A. (1990), Informetric distributions, part II: Resilience to ambiguity,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(5), 376–386.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, S. C. (1953),Documentation, 2nd. ed., London.

  • Dialog (1998),DIALINDEX, [http://library.dialog.com/pktguide/dindex.html], 27 September, 1998.

  • Egghe, L., Ravichandra Rao, I. K. (1992), Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications.Scientometrics, 25(1), 5–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (1990),Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, Amsterdam.

  • Nelson, M. J., Tague, J. M. (1985), Split size-rank models for the distribution of index terms,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(5), 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oluic-Vukovic, V. (1992), Journal productivity distribution: Quantitative study of dynamic behavior,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 412–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. S. (1995),The formation of subject literature collections for bibliometric analysis: The case of Bradford's Law of Scattering, PhD. Dissertation, School of Information, Library and archive Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. S. (1998), Defining subject collections for informetric analyses: The effect of varying the subject aboutness level.Scientometrics, 41 (1–2), 209–223.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, C.S. Using online databases to form subject collections for informetric analyses. Scientometrics 46, 647–667 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459618

Keywords

Navigation