Skip to main content
Log in

Science in america latina: A comparison of bibliometric and scientific-technical indicators

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Latin-American scientific achievement is generally under-represented in databases for a number of reasons pointed out in our study. In this paper we analyze Latin-American scientific production in terms of input (resources) and output (publications). The indicators used were: Gross Domestic Product (GDP), economically active population (EAP), percentage of GNP destined to R+D, and total number of researchers dedicated to R+D. These indicators were subjected to bivariant analysis to determine the degree of correlation with the number of ISI publications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF),Science & Engineering Indicators—1996, NSF, Washington DC, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Cardoza, R. Villegas, América Latina. In:Informe mundial sobre la ciencia 1996, UNESCO, Paris, 1997, p. 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Lewison, A. Fawcett-Jones, C. Kessler, Latin American scientific output 1986–91 and international co-authorship patterns,Scientometrics, 27 (3) (1993) 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Narváez-Berthelemot, An index to measure the international collaboration of developing countries based on participation of national institutions: the case of America Latina,Scientometrics, 34 (1) (1995) 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Narváez-Berthelemot, L.P. Frigoletto, J.F. Miquel, International scientific collaboration in Latin America,Scientometrics, 24 (3) (1992) 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Krauskopf, M.I. Vera, V. Krauskopf, A. Welljams-Dorof, A citationist perspective on science in Latin America and the Caribbean: 1981–1993,Scientometrics, 34 (1) (1995) 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L.A. Quesada-Allué, D.S. Gitlin, Scientific output in Argentina 1966–1983,Scientometrics, 34 (1) (1995) 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Fernández, Estudio bibliométrico preliminar de la producción científica en Argentina: análisis cuantitativo de artículos publicados. In:M. Albornoz, P. Kreimer, E. Glavich,Ciencia y sociedad en América Latina, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Bernal, 1996, p. 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Herrero-Solana, redes de colaboración científica de la Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata: una aproximación bibliométrica a través del Science Citation Index (SCI),Nexos, 5 (9) (1998) 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Sikka, Statistical profile of Science and Technology in India and Brazil,Scientometrics, 39 (2) (1997) 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Schubert, T. Braun, Three scientometric etudes on developing countries as a tribute to Michael Moravcsik,Scientometrics, 23 (1) (1992) 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Osareh, C. Wilson, Third World Countries (TWC) research publications by disciplines: a country-by-country citation analysis,Scientometrics, 39 (3) (1997) 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Citation data reveal world rankings of scientific papers,The Scientist, 11 (14) (1997) 8–9.

  14. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, H. Grupp, The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993: part I. All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics,Scientometrics, 33 (3) (1995) 263–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Braun, A. Schubert, Dimensions of Scientometric Indicator Datafiles: World science in 1990–1994,Scientometrics, 38 (1) (1997) 175–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Braun, A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, H. Maczelka, World science in the eighties. National performances in publication output and citation impact, 1985–1989 versus 1980–1984: part II. Life sciences, engineering, and mathematics,Scientometrics, 31 (1) (1994) 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Schubert, T. Braun, International collaboration in the sciences: 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 19 (1–2) (1990) 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Bonitz, E. Bruckner, A. Scharnhorst, Characteristics and impact of the Matthew Effect for countries,Scientometrics, 40 (3) (1997) 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Merton, The Matthew effect in science,Science, 159 (3810) (1968) 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Papon, R. Barré, Los sistemas de ciencia y tecnología: panorama mundial, In:Informe mundial sobre la ciencia 1996, UNESCO, Paris, 1997, p. 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Albornoz, Indicadores en ciencia y tecnología,REDES: Revista de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia, 1 (1) (1994) 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Principales indicadores de ciencia y tecnología: iberoamericanos-interamericanos (1990–1996), RICyT, Buenos Aires, 1998.

  23. E. Garfield, A statistically valid definition of bias is needed to determine whether the Science Citation Index discriminates against third world journals,Current Science, 73 (8) (1997).

  24. J. Bellavista, E. Guardiola, A. Méndez, M. Bordons,Evaluación de la investigación, Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Madrid, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Sancho, Misjudgments and shortcomings in the measurement of scientific activities in less developed countries,Scientometrics, 23 (1) (1992) 221–233.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Whitney, Access to third world science in international scientific and technical bibliographic databases,Scientometrics, 23 (1) (1992) 201–219.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. M.H. MacRoberts, B.R. MacRoberts, Problems of citation analysis: a critical review,JASIS, 40 (5) (1989) 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M.H. MacRoberts, B.R. MacRoberts, Problems of citations analysis, Scientometrics, 36 (3) (1996) 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Albornoz, E. Fernández-Polcuch, Presentación. In:Indicadores de ciencia y tecnologia. http://www.unq.edu.ar/ricyt/

  30. A.J. Nederhof, R.A. Zwaan, Quality judgements of journals as indicators of research performance in the Humanities and the Social and Behavioural Sciences,JASIS, 42 (5) (1991) 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. F. Moya-Anegón, J. López-Gijón, C. García-Caro,Técnicas cuantitativas aplicadas a la Biblioteconomía y Documentación, Síntesis, Madrid, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Albornoz, E. Fernández-Polcuch, Presentación. In:Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología. http://www.unq.edu.ar/ricyt/

  33. O. Alonso, El Centro de Información Científica y Humanística (CICH) de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) y su contribución a la información bibliográfica latinoamericana,Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 15 (4) (1992) 384–392.

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. Moya-Anegón, E. Jiménez-Contreras, Research fronts in library and information science in Spain (1985–1994),Scientometrics, 42 (2) (1998) 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. F. Moya-Anegón, V. Herrero-Solana, V. Guerrero-Bote, La aplicación de redes neuronales artificiales (RNA) a la recuperación de la información,Anuario SOCADI, 2 (1998), 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  36. B. Hjørland, H. Albrechtsen, Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis.”JASIS, 46 (6) (1995) 400–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Moya-Anegón, F., Herrero-Solana, V. Science in america latina: A comparison of bibliometric and scientific-technical indicators. Scientometrics 46, 299–320 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464780

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464780

Keywords