Skip to main content
Log in

Symmetry and symmetry-breaking in multiagent behavior

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents some results about properties of the spatial behavior of systems consisting of many artificial agents (robots). The general goal is to understand how the complexity of group behavior is related to individual behavior, and how differences arise and can be grounded. We argue that symmetry and symmetry-breaking are essential factors for the organization of spatial group behavior. They can serve as guiding principles for the construction of agents for real-world environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brooks RA, Stein LA (1993) Building brains for bodies. AI Memo 1439, MIT

  2. Bonner JT (1995) Life cycles. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks RA (1990) Elephants don't play chess. In: Maes P (ed) Designing autonomous agents: theory and practice from biology to engineering and back. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bender MA, Slonim DK (1994) The power of team exploration: two robots can learn unlabeled directed graphs. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE CS Press, pp 75–85

  5. Bond AH, Gasser L (eds) (1988) Readings in distributed artificial intelligence. Morgan Kauffmann, San Mateo, Californla

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fukuda T, Ueyama T (1994) Cellular robotics and micro robotic systems. World Scientific, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mataric MJ (1993) Designing emergent behaviors: from local interactions to collective intelligence. In: Meyer I-A, Roitblat HL, Wilson SW (eds) From animals to animats 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 432–441

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dautenhahn K, Christaller T (1995) Remembering, rehearsal and empathy— towards a social and embodied cognitive psychology for artifacts. Arbeitspapiere der GMD, Nr. 956

  9. Caglioti G (1993) Symmetriebrechung und Wahrnehmung. Vieweg, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  10. Genz H, Decker R (1991) Symmetrie und Symmetriebrechung in der Physik. Vieweg, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosen J (1995) Symmetry in science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart I, Golubitsky M (1992) Fearful symmetry. Penguin, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ivanov VV (1983) Gerade und Ungerade. Hirzel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  14. di Primio F, Müller BS (1994) Problem solving abilities of systems for artificial agents. In: Proceedings from Perception to Action Conference, Lausanne IEEE CS Press, pp 322–325

  15. Retz-Schmidt G (1988) Various views on spatial prepositions. AI Magazine, Summer, 95–105

    Google Scholar 

  16. Denebourg JL, Goss S (1989) Collective patterns and decision making. Ethol Ecol Evolut 1:295–311

    Google Scholar 

  17. Braitenberg V (1987) Vehicles— experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. di Primio.

About this article

Cite this article

di Primio, F. Symmetry and symmetry-breaking in multiagent behavior. Artificial Life and Robotics 2, 80–85 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471159

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471159

Key words

Navigation