Abstract
The more recent computer developments cause us to take a new look at human intelligence. The prevailing occidental view of human intelligence represents a very one-sided, logocentric approach, so that it is becoming more urgent to look for a more complete view. In this way, specific strengths of so-called human information processing are becoming particularly evident in a new way. To provide a general substantiation for this view, some elements of a phenomenological model for a dialectical coherence of human expressions of life are briefly outlined. The starting point is the everyday experience of constantly being confronted with contradictory situations. A model of polar, or dualistic, dialectic is proposed, which attempts to systematically establish the contradictions and contingencies of human life in theoretical structures. It is assumed that formal logic fails to work — strictly speaking — when applied to real situations of human interaction. Instead, definite negations are supposed to be involved. In this way, four polarities, pairs of concepts which are mutually dependent on each other and negate each other definitely, are presented: process and structure, the individual and general (societal), acting and imagining, subject-subject-relation and subject-object-relation (love and work). The latter gives rise to the dialectic of emotion and cognition, which plays a decisive role in a comparison of human and computer-“intelligence”.
To cope with the specific human strengths, which are expressed through these polarities, self-learning computers would have to be able to act and to love like human beings and to grow up in a society like people. Furthermore, the learning process would have to implement the process-structure-dialectic with its aspects of finality. In spite of the recent breath-taking achievements of computers, one can not imagine how computers would ever achieve this. Computers are, however, thought of, by virtue of their complexity, being qualitatively different from machines. But human abilities still represent a new level of complexity: the level of dialectic.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bateson, G. (1979).Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity. Aronson, New York.
Benthem, J. v. (1989). Reasoning and Cognition: Towards a Wider Perspective on Logic. In Schnelle and Bernsen (eds.)Logic and Linguistics. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove and London.
Blumenberg, H. (1984).Das Lachen der Thrakerin. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Ciompi, L. (1982).Affektlogik. Über die Struktur der Psyche und ihre Entwicklung: Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart.
Dreyfus, H.L. (1979).What Computers Can't Do. The Limits of Artificial Intelligence. 2nd ed. Harper and Row, New York.
Dreyfus, H.L. and Dreyfus, S.E. (1986).Mind over Machine. The Free Press, New York.
Ehn, P. (1988).Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholdm
Foucault, M. (1983).Sexualität und Wahrheit. I. Band: Der Wille zum Wissen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
Freud, S. (1905).Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie, In Ges. Werke, Band V. Imago, London, 1940 ff.
Freud, S. (1920).Jenseits des Lustprinzips. In: Ges. Werke, Band XIII. Imago, London, 1940 ff.
Freud, S. (1924).Das ökonomische Problem des Masochismus. In: Ges. Werke, Band XIII. Imago, London, 1940 ff.
Freud, S. (1932).Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. Ges. Werke, Band XV. Imago, London, 1940 ff.
Gill, K.S. (1989). Reflections on Participatory Design.AI & Society, 3. (4).
Habermas, J. (1981).Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band I: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1807/1973).Phänomenologie des Geistes. Ullstein, Frankfurt/Berlin/Wien.
Heidegger, G. (1987).Dialektik und Bildung. Widersprüchliche Strukturierungen in Kognition und Emotion. Juventa, Weinheim und München.
Heidegger, G. (1989). Human Experts and Expert Systems: A View from the Shop-Floor.AI & Society, 3. (1) 47–57.
Heidegger, G. (1989). Can Computers Make Love? The Systematic Importance of Emotions in Human Life and Their Implication for Artificial Intelligence. Paper presented at the Brighton Human Centred Systems Workshop, September, 1989.
Heidegger, M. (1962).Being and Time (translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson). Harper and Row, New York. In German:Sein und Zeit, 15th edition, Niemeyer, Tübingen, 1979.
Hofstadter, D.R. (1979). Gödel/Escher/Bach:An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books, New York.
Kesselring, Th. (1981).Entwicklung und Widerspruch. Ein Vergleich zwischen Piagets genetischer Epistemologie und Hegels Dialektik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Kohlberg, L. (1974).Zur kognitiven Entwicklung des Kindes. Drei Aufsätze. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Laird, J.E., Newell, A., and Rosenbloom, P.S. (1987). SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence.Artificial Intelligence. 33, 1–64.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1983).Le Différend. Éditions de Minuit, Paris.
Maturana, H.E. and Varela F. (1980).Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Neumann, J. v. (1958).The Computer and the Brain. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Phillips, W.A. and Baddeley, A. (1989). Learning and Memory. In Baddeley and Bernsen (eds.)Cognitive Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove.
Piaget, J. (1976).Die Äquilibration der kognitiven Strukturen. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart.
Piaget, J. (1980)Les formes élémentaires de la dialectique. Éditions Gallimard, Paris.
Rauner, F., Rasmussen, L. and Corbett, J.M. (1988). The Social Shaping of Technology and Work: Human-Centred CIM Systems.AI & Society, 2 (1), 47–61.
Schnelle, H. (1989). The Challenge of Concrete Linguistic Description: Connectionism, Massively Parallel Distributed Processing, Net-linguistics. In Schnelle and Bernsen (eds.)Logic and Linguistics, Research Directions in Cognitive Science, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove.
Simon, H.A. (1969).The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Sloterdijk, P. (1983).Kritik der zynischen Vernunft.2 Bände. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74.
Turing, A.M. (1964). Computer Machinery and Intelligence. In: Anderson (ed.)Minds and Machines. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Walgenbach, W. (1979).Ansätze zu einer Didaktik ästhetisch-wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Orientierungen für die Theoretisierung eigenen Denkens und Handelns. Beltz, Weinheim.
Weizenbaum, J. (1984).Computer Power and Human Reason. From Judgement to Calculation. 2nd edn. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, England.
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1988).Understanding Computers and Cognition. A New Foundation for Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heidegger, G. Machines, computers, dialectics: A new look at human intelligence. AI & Soc 6, 27–40 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472767
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472767