Skip to main content
Log in

Moral dimension of man and artificial intelligence

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steady technological and economic progress gives science and the scientific method a distinguished position in today's culture. Therefore, there may be an impression that areas not belonging to science may hamper this progress of humanity. The views of Dean E. Wooldridge exemplify this position. The only hope is seen in the rational dimension of man in which there is no room for ethical considerations. This rational dimension is also the sole representation of man in the image created by artificial intelligence. Before, AI was at least interested in philosophical issues concerning a model of man, now, AI has no interest in them; it has become an applied science trying to produce workable systems for military and industrial application. However, the model of rational man remained, and because of the prestige of computer science, the model is the most widely recognized as an official model of our epoch.

There are three possible ways of improving the situation with regard to the moral dimension of man: saturating knowledge bases with moral values, carefully choosing the sponsor of each project, and saturating education with ethics by making it a part of each major on the undergraduate, and, in particular, the graduate levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boden, M. (1977).Artificial intelligence and natural man, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drozdek, A. (1990). Programmabilism: A new reductionism.Epistemologia 13, 235–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, T. and Morrison, P. (1990).Computer ethics: Cautionary tales and ethical dilemmas in computing, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1969). Introduction. In Minsky, M. (ed.),Semantic information processing, Cambridge: The MIT Press 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., Shaw, J. C. and Simon, H. A. (1957). Empirical explorations with the Logic Theory Machine: A case study in heuristics. In: Feigenbaum, E. A. and Feldman, J. (eds.),Computers and thought, New York: McGraw-Hill 1963, 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. (1958). Heuristic problem solving: The next advance in operations research.Operations Research,6, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifikin, J. (1984).Algeny, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servan-Schreiber, J. J. (1979).The American challenge, New York: Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, S. (1986). Ethics, mind and artifice, In: Gill, K. S. (ed.),Artificial intelligence for society, Chichester: Wiley. 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, K. V. (1984). Is consciousness necessary?British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,35, 223–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, D. E. (1969). Can mechanical man find goodness, truth and beauty?Psychology Today 2, 11, 26, 28–9, 64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drozdek, A. Moral dimension of man and artificial intelligence. AI & Soc 6, 271–280 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472799

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472799

Keywords

Navigation