Skip to main content
Log in

Fractal evaluations of fish school movements in simulations and real observations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fish schools behave like a single organism, and this offers considerable survival advantages. In our simulations, a fish school is well organized, without a leader, and behaves like a single creature depending solely on the interactions among individuals. This kind of system can be said to be typical of “complex systems.” In this article, it is shown that fractal evaluation is useful to understand the features of fish school movements. We make clear the validity of fractal analyses to quantify fish school movements through evaluations of simulated fish school movements andsardine movements. These fractal analyses show that we need two different fractal dimensions (D 1,D 2) to understand the features of fish school movements:D 1 corresponds to thesmaller coarsening levels, andD 2 corresponds to thelarge coarsening levels. The linear analyses in log-log space give an excellent fit with both the simulated movements and the sardine school movements. In approaching complex systems or complex behaviors, fractal analyses have attracted wide attention in mathematics, physical sciences, and information science. The fractal evaluations here convince us that we are coming close to understanding the structure of complex movements of animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. West BJ (1990) Fractal physiology and chaos in medicine. World Scientific, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aoki I (1982) A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 48:1081–1088

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huth A, Wissel C (1992) The simulation of the movement of fish schools. J Theor Biol 156:365–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shinchi T, Nishimura H, Kitazoe T, et al. (2000) Quantitative analyses and fractal structures of fish school movements. In: Sugisaka M (ed) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics (AROB5th), Beppu, Oita, Japan, January 26–28, 2000, p 153–156

  5. Shaw E (1970) Schooling in fishes: critique and review. In: Arson L (ed) Development and evolution of behaviour. p 452–480

  6. Reuter H, Breckling B (1994) Self-organization of fish schools: an object-oriented model. Ecol Model 75/76:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aoki I (1980) An analysis of the schooling behavior of fish: internal organization and communication process. Bull Ocean Res Inst Univ Tokyo 12:1–65

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishimura H, Shinchi T (1995) Fractal analysis of one-dimensional cellular automata as time-series vectors (in Japanese). Inf Process Soc Jpn Tran 36:787–796

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Higuchi T (1988) Approach to an irregular times series on the basis of the fractal theory. Pysica D 31:277–283

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuro Shinchi.

About this article

Cite this article

Shinchi, T., Kitazoe, T., Nishimura, H. et al. Fractal evaluations of fish school movements in simulations and real observations. Artif Life Robotics 6, 36–43 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481207

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481207

Key words

Navigation