Skip to main content
Log in

Criticality of cooperative society

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generally speaking, there are two types of interaction, synchronous interactions (N members interact simultaneously) and asynchronous interactions (each member interacts withN neighboring agents individually). The purpose of this paper is to consider the dynamics of the evolution of a cooperative society with synchronous interaction by focusing on the spatial size of the interaction. Asynchronous interaction is dealt with in the cumulative payoff of individual 2-interated prisoner's dilemma (2-IPD) games. The result has shown that an adequate spatial size for interaction promotes a highly cooperative society, but it gets more difficult for agents with synchronous interactions to achieve a cooperative society as it increases in size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shiozawa Y (2000) Significance of artificial markets for economics (in Japanese) Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, vol 6(6), p 951–957

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iwanaga S, Namatame A (2001) Asymmetric coordination of hetrogeneous agents. IEICE Trans. INF & SYST., Vol E 84-D, No. 8, p 937–944

    Google Scholar 

  3. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. AxeIrod R (1997) The complexity of cooperation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ikeda T, Iba T (2001) The strategy evolution inN-person iterated prisoner's dilemma games. IPSJ ICS 127:194–198

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ishida T, Yokoi H, Kakazu Y (1998) Competitive social system with self-organized norms of behavior. Intell Eng Syst Artif Neural Networks 8:573–578

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seo Y-G, Cho S-B, Yao X (1999) Emergence of cooperative coalition inN-IPD game with localization of interaction and learning. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol 2, IEEE Press, Washington D.C., p 877–884

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seo Y, Cho S, Yao X (2000) The impact of payoff function and local interaction on theN-player interated prisoner's dilemma game knowledge and information systems, vol 2, Issue 4, Springer, p 461–478

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Uno K, Namatame A (1999) Evolutionary behaviors emerged through strategic interactions in the large. Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Orland, p 1414–1421

  10. Uno K, Namatame A (1999) An evolutionary design of the networks of mutual reliability. Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation Morgan Kaufmann p 1717–1723

  11. Hansaryi J, Selten R (1988) A game theory of equibrium selection in games, MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masao Kubo.

About this article

Cite this article

Kubo, M., Sasakabe, Y. Criticality of cooperative society. Artif Life Robotics 6, 66–72 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481211

Key words

Navigation