Abstract
User-oriented clustering schemes enable the classification of documents based upon the user's perception of the similarity between documents, rather than on some similarity function presumed by the designer to represent the user's criteria. In an earlier paper it was shown that such a classification scheme can be developed in two stages. The first stage involves the accumulation of relevance judgements provided by users,vis-à-vis past query instances, into a suitable structure. The second stage consists of cluster identification. When the structure chosen, in the first stage, for the accumulation of corelevance characteristics of documents is a straight line, the second stage can be formulated as a function optimization problem termed the Boundary Selection Problem (BSP). A branch-and-bound algorithm with a good bounding function is developed for the BSP. Although significant pruning is achieved due to the bounding function, the complexity is still high for a problem of a large size. For such a problem a heuristic that divides it into a number of subproblems, each being solved by a branch-and-bound approach, is developed. Then the overall problem is mapped to an integer knapsack problem and solved by the use of dynamic programming. The tradeoff between accuracy and complexity can be controlled, giving the user a preference of one over the other. Assuming that the heuristic which divides the overall problem introduces no errors and is given sufficient time, the branch and bound with dynamic programming (BBDP) approach will converge to the optimal solution. Two other heuristic approaches, one with the application of a polynomial dynamic programming algorithm and the other which works in a greedy way, are also proposed for the BSP and an experimental comparison of all these approaches is provided. Experimental results indicate that all proposed algorithms show better performance compared with the existing algorithm.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
[Da] Dattola, R. T., Experiments with a Fast Algorithm for Automatic Classification, inThe SMART Retrieval System—Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pp. 265–297, G. Salton, ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971.
[Do] Doyle, L. B., Breaking the Cost Barrier in Automatic Classification, Report No. SP-2516, System Development Corp. Santa Monica, CA, 1966.
[DR] Deogun, J. S., and Raghavan, V. V., User-Oriented Document Clustering: A Framework for Learning in Information Retrieval,Proc. ACM Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 157–163, Pisa, 1986.
[F] Fisher, W. D., On Grouping for Maximum Homogeneity,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., Vol. 53, pp. 789–798, 1958.
[H] Hartigan, J. A.,Clustering Algorithms, Wiley, New York, 1975.
[J] Jardine, N., and Sibson, R., A Model for Taxonomy,Math. Biosci., Vol. 15, pp. 493–513, 1968.
[P] Pawlak, Z.,On Learning— a Rough Set Approach, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 208, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986.
[RA] Raghavan, V. V., and Agarwal, B., Optimal Determination of User-Oriented Clusters: An Application for the Productive Plan. Genetic Algorithms and Their Application,Proc. Second Internat. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 241–246.
[RD] Raghavan, V. V., and Deogun, J. S., Optimal Determination of User-Oriented Clusters,Proc. Tenth International ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 140–146, New Orleans, 1987.
[S] Salton, G.The SMART Retrieval System— Experiment in Automatic Document Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971.
[SW] Salton, G., and Wong, A., Generation and Search of Clustered Files,ACM Trans. Database Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 321–346, 1978.
[VC] Van Rijsbergen, C. J., and Croft, W. B., Document Clustering: An Evaluation of Some Experiments with the Cranfield 1400 Collection,Inform. Process. Manag., Vol. 11, pp. 171–182, 1975.
[VS] Van Rijsbergen, C. J., and Sparck Jones, K., A Test for the Separation of Relevant and Non-Relevant Documents in Experimental Retrieval Collections,J. Documentation, Vol. 29, pp. 251–257, 1973.
[V] Voorhees, E. M., The Cluster Hypothesis Revisited,Proc. Eighth Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Montreal, Quebec, pp. 188–196, 1985.
[Y] Yu, C. T., A Clustering Algorithm Based on User Queries,J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci., Vol. 25, pp. 218–226, 1974.
[YWC] Yu, C. T., Wang, Y. T., and Chen, C. H., Adaptive Document Clustering,Proc. Eighth Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 197–203, Montreal, Quebec, 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by C. L. Liu.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhuyan, J.N., Deogun, J.S. & Raghavan, V.V. Algorithms for the boundary selection problem. Algorithmica 17, 133–161 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522823
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522823