Skip to main content
Log in

Back to the future: from knowledge management to the management of information and data

  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues for a return to fundamentals and for a balanced assessment of the contribution that Information Technology can make as we enter the new millennium. It argues that the field of Information Systems should no longer be distracted from its natural locus of concern and competence, or claim more than it can actually achieve. More specifically, and as a case in point, we eschew IT-enabled Knowledge Management, both in theory and in practice. We view Knowledge Management as the most recent in a long line of fads and fashions embraced by the Information Systems community that have little to offer. Rather, we argue for a refocusing of our attention back on the management ofdata, since IT processes data-notinformation and certainly notknowledge. In so doing, we develop a model that provides a tentative means of distinguishing between the terms. This model also forms the basis for on-going empirical research designed to test the efficacy of our argument in a number of case companies currently implementing ERP and Knowledge Management Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam F, Fitzgerald B (1996) A framework for analyzing the evolution of the IS field-can IS become a stable discipline?Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Information Systems, Lisbon, Portugal, 2–4 July, vol. I, pp. 17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler P, Kwon S-W (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept.Academy of Management Review 27(1): 17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi M, Leidner DE (1999) Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges and benefits.Communication of the AIS, 1(7), February:

  • Brancheau JC, Janz BD, Wetherbe JC (1996) Key issues in Information Systems management: 1994–95., SIM Delphi results.MIS Quarterly 20(2): 225–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation.Organization Science 2(1): 40–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns T, Stalker GM (1961).The Management, of Innovation. Tavistock. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB (1981).Systems Thinking. Systems Practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra C (1994) The grassroots of IT and strategy. In: Ciborra C, Jelassi T (eds)Strategic Information Systems: A European Perspective. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark P, Staunton N (1989).Innovation in Technology and Organisation. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes E, Willis D, Lloyd-Jones R (2002)The New Socio-Tech: Graffiti on the Long Wall. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings S, Wilson DC (2002)Images of Strategy, Blackwell, Oxford (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993)Process Innovation Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1996) Why reengineering failed: the fad that forgot people.Fast Company, Premier Issue, pp. 70–74.

  • Galliers RD (1991) Strategic information systems planning: myths, reality and guidelines for successful, implementation.European Journal of Information Systems 1(1): 55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galliers RD (1993) Research, issues in information systems.Journal of Information Technology 8(2): 92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers RD, Swan JA (1999) Information systems and strategic change. In: Currie WL, Galliers RD (eds)Rethinking, Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 361–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers RD, Jackson M, Mingers J (1997) Organization theory and systems thinking: the benefits of partnership,Organization 4(2): 269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen KJ (1999)An Invitation to Social construction, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M et al. (1995)The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M, Nohria N, Tierney T (1999) What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?Harvard Business Review 77(2): 106–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1980)Culture’s Consequences. Sage, Beverley Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland CP, Light B, Gibson N (1999) A critical success factors model for Enterprise Resource Planning.Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Information Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark, 23–25 June, vol. I, pp 273–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa SL, tiller EH (1999) Integrating market, technology and policy options in E-Commerce Strategy.Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8(3): 235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen PGW (1980) MIS research: reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition.Proceedings of the 1st International conference on Information Systems, Philadelphia, PA, pp 9–18

  • Keen PGW (1987) MIS Research: Current Status, Trends and Needs. In: Buckingham RA, Hirschheim RA, Land FF, Tully CJ (eds)Information Systems Education: Recommendations and Implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Land F (1982) Adapting to changing user requirements.Information & Management 5: 59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land F (1996) The new alchemist: how to transmute base organizations into corporations of gleaming gold.Journal of Strategic Information Systems 5(1): 5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leidner DE (2000) Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems, Special Issue.Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9(2–3): 101–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall L (1997) Facilitating knowledge management and knowledge sharing: new opportunities for information professionals.Online 21(5): 92–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J (1982).Strategic Data Planning Methodologies. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E (1994) New treatments or old remedies: Is business process reengineering really socio-technical design?.Journal of Strategic Information Systems 3(4): 313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Galliers RD (2000) More than a footnote: the perils of multidisciplinary research.Proceedings of the 2000 Americas Conference on Information Systems Long Beach, California, August, vol III, pp 1738–1742

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Pan S-L, Galliers RD, Huang JC (2001) The myth of the boundaryless organization.Communications of the ACM 44(12): 74–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Huang JC, Galliers RD, Pan S-L (2002) Implementing enterprise resource planning and knowledge management systems in tandem: fostering, efficiency and innovation complementarily.Information and Organization (forthcoming)

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995)The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon S (1999) Management’s role and internet commerce benefit among online small businesses.Proceedings of the 7 th European Conference on Information Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark, 23–25 June, vol. II, pp 559–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Millar VE (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage.Harvard Business, Review 66(4): 149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990)The Fifth Discipline: The Age of Practice of the Learning Organization. Century Business, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan J, Scarbrough H, Preston J (1999) Knowledge management: the next fad to forget people?Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Information Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark, 23–25 June, vol II, pp 668–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner P (2000)Achieving and maintaining the human advantage in organizations: the role of HR 1979–1997 and beyond. NBS Professorial Paper No. 1, Nottingham Business School, The Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson RT, Kelly GG, Galliers RD, Brancheau JC (1997) Key issues in information systems management: an international perspective.Journal of Management Information Systems 13(4): 91–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sense making in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster.Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 628–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galliers, R.D., Newell, S. Back to the future: from knowledge management to the management of information and data. Information Systems and e-Business Management 1, 5–13 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683507

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683507

Key words

Navigation