Abstract
Goodness of fit test statistics based on the empirical distribution function (EDF) are considered for the generalized negative binomial distribution. The small sample levels of the tests are found to be very close to the nominal significance levels. For small sample sizes, the tests are compared with respect to their simulated power of detecting some alternative hypotheses against a null hypothesis of generalized negative binomial distribution. The discrete Anderson—Darling test is the most powerful among the EDF tests. Two numerical examples are used to illustrate the application of the goodness of fit tests.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Baringhaus, L., Henze, N.: A goodness of fit test for the Poisson distribution based on the empirical generating function. Statistics Prob. Letters13, 269–274 (1992).
Conover, H. J.: Kolmogorov goodness of fit test for discontinuous distributions. JASA67, 591–597 (1972).
Consul, P. C., Famoye, F.: On the unimodality of generalized negative binomial distribution. Stat. Neerlandica40, 141–144 (1986).
Consul, P. C., Famoye, F.: On the generalized negative binomial distribution. Comm. Statistics24, 459–472 (1995).
Consul, P. C., Gutpa, R. C.: The generalized negative binomial distribution and its characterization by zero regression. SIAM J. Appl. Math.39, 231–237 (1980).
Consul, P. C., Shenton, L. R.: Some interesting properties of Lagrangian distributions. Comm. Statistics2, 263–272 (1973).
Consul, P. C., Shenton, L. R.: On the probabilistic structure and properties of discrete Lagrangian distributions. In: A modern course on statistical distributions in scientific work (Patil, G. P., Kotz, S., Ord, J. K., eds.), vol. 1, pp. 41–57. Boston: Reidel, 1975.
D’Agostino, R. B., Stephens, M. A.: Goodness-of-fit techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1986.
Famoye, F., Consul, P. C.: A stochastic urn model for the generalized negative binomial distribution. Statistics20, 607–613 (1989).
Freedman, L. S.: Watson’sU n/2 statistic for a discrete distribution. Biometrika68, 708–711 (1981).
Good, I. J.: Generalizations to several variables of Lagrange’s expansion with applications to stochastic processes. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.56, 367–380 (1960).
Good, I. J.: The Lagrange distributions and branching processes. SIAM J. Appl. Math.28, 270–275 (1975).
Horn, S. D.: Goodness-of-fit tests for discrete data: A review and an application to a health impairment scale. Biometrics33, 237–248 (1977).
Jain, G. C., Consul, P. C.: A generalized negative binomial distribution. SIAM J. Appl. Math.21, 501–513 (1971).
Stephens, M. A.: EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. JASA69, 730–737 (1974).
Stute, W., Manteiga, W. G., Quindimil, M. P.: Bootstrap based goodness-of-fit tests. Metrika40, 243–256 (1993).
Whittaker, E. T., Watson, G. N.: A course of modern analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1927.
Yan, J. F.: Cross-linking of polymers with a primary size distribution. Macromolecules12, 260–264 (1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The support received from the Research Professorship Program at Central Michigan University under the grant #22159 is gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Famoye, F. Bootstrap based tests for generalized negative binomial distribution. Computing 61, 359–369 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684385
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684385