Skip to main content
Log in

Saddlepoint approximations to studentized bootstrap distributions based onM-estimates

  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Saddlepoint methods can provide extremely accurate approximations to resampling distributions. This article applies them to distributions of studentized bootstrap statistics based on robustM-estimates. As examples we consider the studentized versions of Huber’sM-estimate of location, of its initially MAD scaled version, and of Huber’s proposal 2. The studentized version of Huber’s proposal 2 seems to be a preferable measure of location. Remarks on implementation and related problems are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, V. and Lewis, T., 1994.Outliers in Statistical Data (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. E., 1954. Saddlepoint approximations in statistics.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,25, 631–650.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. E. and Young, G. A., 1991. Saddlepoint approximation for the studentized mean, with an application to the bootstrap.Biometrika,78, 169–179.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A. C. and Hinkley, D. V., 1988. Saddlepoint approximations in resampling methods.Biometrika,75, 417–431.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A. C. and Hinkley, D. V., 1997.Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A. C., Hinkley, D. V. and Worton, B. J., 1995. Accurate and efficient construction of bootstrap likelihoods.Statistics and Computing,5, 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, F. R., Ronchetti, E. M., Rousseeuw, P. J. and Stahel, W. J., 1986.Robust Statistics, the Approach Based on Influence Functions. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P. J., 1964. Robust estimation of a location parameter.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,35, 73–101.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P. J., 1981.Robust Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. L., 1995.Saddlepoint Approximations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuonen, D., 2001.Computer-intensive statistical methods: with applications in bootstrap and robust inference. PhD Thesis N. 2449, Department of Mathematics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH-1015 Lausanne, (stat.kuonen.com/thesis/)

  • Kuonen, D., 2003. Numerical integration in S-Plus or R: A survey.Journal of Statistical Software,8, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudte, R. G. and Sheather, S. J., 1990.Robust Estimation and Testing. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author expresses his deep gratitude to his PhD thesis supervisor A. C. Davison for his suggestions relating to this work, which was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuonen, D. Saddlepoint approximations to studentized bootstrap distributions based onM-estimates. Computational Statistics 20, 231–244 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789701

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789701

Keywords