Skip to main content
Log in

The history of the homology concept and the “Phylogenetisches Symposium”

  • Published:
Theory in Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The homology concept has had a long and varied history, starting out as a geometrical term in ancient Greece. Here we describe briefly how a typological use of homology to designate organs and body parts in the same position anatomically in different organisms was changed by Darwin’s theory of evolution into a phylogenetic concept. We try to indicate the diversity of opinions on how to define and test for homology that has prevailed historically, before the important books by Hennig (1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin) and Remane (1952. Die Grundlagen des Natürlichen Systems, der Vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Geest & Portig, Leipzig) brought more rigor into both the debate on homology and into the usage of the term homology among systematists. Homology as a theme has recurred repeatedly throughout the history of the “Phylogenetisches Symposium” and we give a very brief overview of the different aspects of homology that have been discussed at specific symposia over the last 48 years. We also honour the fact that the 2004 symposium was held in Jena by pointing to the roles played by biologists active in Jena, such as Ernst Haeckel and Carl Gegenbaur, in starting the development towards a homology concept concordant with an evolutionary world view. As historians of biology, we emphasize the importance of major treatises on homology and its history that may be little read by systematists active today, and have sometimes also received less attention by historians of biology than they deserve. Prominent among these are the works of Dietrich Starck, who also happened to be both a student, and later a benefactor, of systematics at Jena University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abouheif, E., 1997. Developmental genetics and homology: a hierarchical approach. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 405–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bljacher, L.Ja, 1965. Analogie und Homologie. Studien zur Geschichte der Morphologie, Part 6. In: Der Entwicklungsgedanke in der Biologie, Moskau, pp. 123–130 (in Russian).

  • Camper, P., 1784. Kurze Nachricht von der Zergliederung verschiedener Orang-Utans. Herrn Pieter Campers kleine Schriften. Part 2, vol. 1. Verlag S. L. Crusins, Leipzig, pp. 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camper, P., 1785. Nachricht vom Sprachwerkzeuge des Orang-Utan. Herrn Pieter Campers sämtliche kleinere Schriften. Verlag S. L. Crusins, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beer, G., 1971. An Unsolved Problem. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, W.J., 1995. Molecules and morphology: where’s the homology? Trends Genet. 11, 119–121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freye, H.A., 1967. Kompendium der Zoologie, third ed. Gustav Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, H., 1932. Kritische Studien zur Geschichte und zum Wesen des Begriffes der Homologie. Ergebn. Anat. 29, 25–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegenbaur, C., 1878. Grundzüge der vergleichenden Anatomie, second ed. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffroy, St. Hilaire, E., 1825. Mémoires sur la structure et les usages de l’appareil olfactif. Ann. Des Sci. Natur. 6.

  • Gersch, M., 1964. Vergleichende Endokrinologie der wirbellosen Tiere. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersch, M., 1967. Neuere Ergebnisse über Neurohormone der Insekten. Forsch. Fortsch. 41, 257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E., 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, vol. 2. Georg Reimer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E., 1872. Monographie der Kalkschwämme, vol. 3. Georg Reimer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.K. (Ed.), 1994. Homology. The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, T., Kleisner, K., 2005. The Five “Homes” of zoologist Mikhail M. Novikov (1876–1965). Analogy and adaptation in one’s life and as a principle of biological investigation. Jahrb. Europ. Wissenschaft. 1, 87–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoßfeld, U., 2002. ‘Konstruktion durch Umkonstruktion’—Hans Bökers vergleichende biologische Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. Verh. Gesch. Theor. Bio. 9, 149–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoßfeld, U., Olsson, L., 2003a. The road from Haeckel. The Jena tradition in evolutionary morphology and the origin of “Evo-Devo”. Biol. Philos. 18, 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoßfeld, U., Olsson, L., 2003b. The History of Comparative Anatomy in Jena—An Overview. Theory Biosci. 122, 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoßfeld, U., Olsson, L., Breidbach, O. (Eds.), 2003. Carl Gegenbaur and Evolutionary Morphology. Theory Biosci. 122 (2/3).

  • Junker, T., Hoßfeld, U., 2001. Die Entdeckung der Evolution. Eine revolutionäre Theorie und ihre Geschichte. WBG, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, O., 1984. Die Veranstaltung „Phylogenetisches Symposium”: Rückblick auf 25 Tagungen (1955–1982), Verh. des naturwiss. Ver. Hamb. (NF) 27, 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, O., Hoßfeld, U., 1998. 40 Jahre „Phylogenetisches Symposion” (1957–1997): eine Übersicht. Anfänge, Entwicklung, Dokumentation und Wirkung. Jahrb. Gesch. Theor. Biol. 5, 157–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankester, E. R., 1870. On the use of the term homology. Ann. Magaz. Nat. Hist. Zool. Bot. Geol. 6, 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, M.D., 2000. Homology in development and the development of the homology concept. Am. Zool. 40, 777–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levit, G., Hoßfeld, U., Olsson, L., 2004. The integration of darwinism and evolutionary morphology: Alexej Nikolajevich Sewertzoff (1866–1936) and the developmental basis of evolutionary change. J. Exp. Zool. B. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 302, 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, K., 1976. Homologieforschung in der Ethologie. VEB Gustav Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, K., 1978. Homologiekriterien als Mittel des Erkenntnisgewinns. In: Tembrock, G., Geissler, E. Scheler, W. (Eds.), Philosophische und Ethische Probleme der Modernen Verhaltensforschung. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister, K., 2005. Metaphysische Konsequenz. Die idealistische Morphologie Edgar Dacques. Neues Jb. f. Geol. Paläontol. Abh. 235, 197–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitgutsch, C., 2003. On Carl Gegenbaur’s theory on head metamerism and the selection of taxa for comparisons. Theory Biosci. 122, 204–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G.B., Wagner, G.P., 1996. Homology, Hox genes, and developmental integration. Am. Zool. 36, 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naef, A., 1926. Zur Diskussion des Homologiebegriffes und seiner Anwendung in der Morphologie. Biol. Zentralbl. 46, 405–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naef, A., 1927. Die Definition des Homologiebegriffes. Biol. Zentralbl. 47, 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowikoff, M., 1935. Homomorphie, Homologie und Analogie. Anatom. Anz. 80, 388–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., 1848. On the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton. John Van Voorst, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchen, A.L., 1999. Homology-history of a concept. In: Bock, G.R., Cardew, G. (Eds.), Homology. Novartis Foundation Symposium 222. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plate, L., 1922. Allgemeine Zoologie und Abstammungslehre. Gustav Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, R.A., 1996. The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane, A., 1952. Die Grundlagen des Natürlichen Systems, der Vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Geest & Portig, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane, A., 1955. Morphologie als Homologienforschung. Ver. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1954 in Tübingen, 159–183.

  • Remane, A., 1960. Das soziale Leben der Tiere. Rowohlt, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane, J., 1989. The development of the homology-concept since Adolf Remane. Zool. Beitr. N.F. 32 (3), 497–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel, O., 1994. Homology, topology, and typology: The history of modern debates. In: Hall, B.K. (Ed.), Homology. The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 63–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, V.L., 1988. The biological basis of homology. In: Humphries, C.J. (Ed.), Ontogeny and Systematics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, N.A., 1994. Richard Owen, Victorian Naturalist. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, St., 2004. Histoire d’une question anatomique. La répétition des parties. Publications Scientifiques du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Archives, 6), Paris.

  • Spemann, H., 1915. Zur Geschichteu und Kritik des Begriffs der Homologie. In: Chun, C., Johannsen, W. (Eds.), Allgemeine Biologie. B. G. Teubner, Leipzig/Berlin, pp. 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starck, D., 1950. Wandlungen des Homologiebegriffes. Zool. Anz. 145, 957–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starck, D., 1963. Die Metamerie des Kopfes der Wirbeltiere. Zool. Anz. 170, 393–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembrock, G., 1967. Grundlagen der Tierpsychologie. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembrock, G., 1989. Homologisieren in der Ethologie. Zool. Beitr. N.F. 32 (3), 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, W., 1973. Homologie und Typus in der Biologie. Weltanschaulich-philosophische und erkenntnistheoretisch-methodologische Probleme. Gustav Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D.B., 2003. Homology and homoplasy. In: Hall, B.K., Olson, W.M. (Eds.), Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Harvard University Press/MA, London/England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G.P., 1995. The biological role of homologues: A building block hypothesis. N. Jb. Geol. Palaont. Abh. 195, 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickler, W., 1965. Über den taxonomischen Wert homologer Verhaltensmerkmale. Die Natur. 52, 441–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wickler, W., 1967. Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung und Phylogenetik. in: Heberer, G. (Ed.), Die Evolution der Organismen, third ed. vol. I. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart/Jena, pp. 420–508.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Hoßfeld.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoßfeld, U., Olsson, L. The history of the homology concept and the “Phylogenetisches Symposium”. Theory Biosci. 124, 243–253 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02814486

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02814486

Keywords

Navigation